External Factors of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict in the Context of the Second Karabakh War

Aim. To identify the features of the behavior of external actors in the South Caucasus during the Second Karabakh War and rank them according to the degree of influence on the events, outcomes, and settlement of the post-conflict situation.
Tasks. To find out the main reasons for Armenia’s military defeat, as well as the extent of involvement in the armed conflict and post-conflict settlement of Turkey, Great Britain, Iran, the USA, France, the OSCE Minsk Group and the EU.
Methods. Among the techniques and ways to achieve the stated goal of the study, the methods of comparative analysis, which allowed by comparing the degree of involvement and role in the conflict to identify beneficiaries and the most promising applicants for participation in post-conflict settlement; structural and functional analysis aimed at identifying connections, relationships and mediations between the participants of the events under consideration.
Results. The analysis of the interested and motivated behavior of Turkey, Iran, the UK, the USA, France, the Minsk Group, and the EU in the 44-day armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan was carried out. An attempt is made to rank external actors according to the degree of influence on the course and outcome of the war; the main reasons for Armenia’s military defeat are established; Iran’s behavior and role in the conditions of war and post-conflict settlement are characterized; Azerbaijan’s support in the conflict by the countries of the Turkic Council is shown; the involvement of Turkey and Great Britain in the war is established; The role of Russia in the end of the war was determined; the positions of the USA and France as co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group were clarified; the EU’s application for mediation in the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani contradictions was assessed.
Conclusions. Contrary to numerous opinions about the paralysis of Russia’s political will in the South Caucasus, it was Russia that, following the results of the Second Karabakh War, managed to strengthen its position and role in regional politics, unite its allies — Armenia and Azerbaijan — around it, inspire them with an understanding of the need to end armed confrontation in the conflict zone, and propose a realistic program of joint actions towards its political settlement.

1. Andreeva E. S. The impact of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020 on Iran’s policy in the South Caucasus. Problems of national strategy [Problemy natsional’noi strategii]. 2021. No. 5 (68). P. 104–116. (In Rus.)

2. Hajiyev K. S. South Caucasus through the prism of the Second Karabakh War. Russia and the new states of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2021. No. 3 (52). P. 126–139. (In Rus.)

3. Gegelashvili N. A. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: the interests of the USA and the position of the EU. Russia and the new states of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2021. No. 3 (52). P. 140–152. (In Rus.)

4. Kogut V. G., Nuryshev G. N. The Karabakh knot of geopolitical contradictions in the South Caucasus. Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2021. No. 1. P. 104–111. (In Rus.)

5. Krivopalov A. A. Operational and technological prerequisites for Azerbaijan’s victory in Nagorno-Karabakh. Russia and the new States of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2021. No. 3 (52). P. 165–173. (In Rus.)

6. Pritchin S. A. The Second Karabakh War and the situation in the South Caucasus. Russia and the new States of Eurasia [Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii]. 2021. No. 3 (52). P. 153–164. (In Rus.)

7. Safaryan R. A. The position of the Russian Foreign Ministry on the settlement of the conflict during the Second Karabakh War. Regions of the world: problems of history, culture and politics: collection of scientific. articles. Nizhny Novgorod, 2021. P. 144–154. (In Rus.)

8. Torin A. Scrapping the status quo in Nagorno-Karabakh: regional and international consequences of the conflict [Electronic resource]. International life [Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’]. November 20, 2020. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/28164 (accessed: 06/27/2022). (In Rus.)

9. Shumilov M. M., Shumilov Y. M. Military cooperation between Turkey and Azerbaijan in the context of the project of creating a pan-Turkic army. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation [Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo]. Yearbook. Issue 5. Part 1. Moscow, 2022. P. 322–326. (In Rus.)