Preview

EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics

Advanced search

Interpretation of Values in the Conceptual and Strategic Documents of the EAEU Countries: The Factor of Global Turbulence

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-102-111

Abstract

In a   situation  of growing international confrontation, it is important to clearly identify tools and mechanisms that can contribute to the consolidation of the positions of states friendly to Russia. In the context of one of the lines of global fragmentation — the division of the world into the West and non-West  — the deepening and expansion of the Eurasian integration agenda is actualized.

Aim . To determine the specifics of the interpretation of values in the conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU   countries in  the context of their adaptation to the current challenges and threats of national and international security, integration dynamics and changes in the external environment in the conditions of global turbulence.

Task . To characterize the axiological aspect of the existing conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU countries; to  identify key concepts that reveal the concept of values in them; to show common and distinctive features in the approaches of the EAEU   countries in this area and the possibilities of their convergence at the integration level.

Methods. The study was based on comparative analysis and non-formalized qualitative analysis of documents.

Results. The main semantic blocks in the content of the conceptual and strategic documents of the EAEU   countries are  highlighted, taking into account the designated problem field. The focus of attention was on the interpretation of external challenges and threats, manifestations of global turbulence; articulation of certain values in a  changing extern al environment; linking with the ethno-cultural component and identity issues. A  significant  coupling of approaches to the interpretation of values with the influence of external factors has been established. The specificity of verification of sources and directions of destructive influence is shown.

Conclusions. The approaches of the EAEU countries to the interpretation of values in the perspective of events and processes taking place in the external dimension have a   large number of coincidences and common features. The central concept in the studied documents is spiritual and moral values, the preservation and protection of which are embedded in the system of national interests / national  strategic priorities. In the external dimension, international humanitarian cooperation is emphasized, which is conceived as a  way of inter-civilizational dialogue against the background of increasing instability and conflict. A  serious vulnerability can be considered the absence of an explicit interface between the value agenda formed by each of the countries of the Union and their integration guidelines and preferences.

About the Authors

O. V. Bakhlova
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Russian Federation

Olga   V.   Bakhlova , Professor of Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies, Doctor of Science (Political Science), Associate Professor

Saransk



I. V. Bakhlov
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Russian Federation

Igor  V.  Bakhlov,  Head of Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies, Doctor of Science (Political Science), Associate Professor

Saransk



References

1. Vatyl V. N. Protection of State Sovereignty in the Republic of Belarus: Countering Destructive Threats in the Political Sphere // Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno [Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly]. Series 1. History and Archeology. Philosophy. Political Science. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 123–128. (In Rus.)

2. Viver V. N. Eurasian Integration in American Scientific-Academic Discourse // International Organizations Research Journal [Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij]. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 307–327. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-03-12

3. Glazyev C. Yu., Kefeli I. F. On the Question of the Ideology of the Eurasian Economic Union // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evrazijskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2022. No. 1. P. 10–21. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-01-10-21

4. Kabaziev M. Formation of the National Identity of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Peculiarities and Contradictions // Contemporary Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2022. No. 7. P. 221–231. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.31857/S020170832207018X

5. Kefeli I. F. Eurasian Civilization: from an Idea to Modern Discourse // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evrazijskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2021. No. 2. P. 12–25. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2021-02-12-25

6. Osadchaya G. I. Eurasian Integration: Principles, Ideology, Practice // Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology [Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sociologiya]. 2020. No. 1. P. 31–43. (In Rus.)

7. Polulyakh D. S. Turbulence as a Characteristic of Contemporary World Order // Political Science (Ru) [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2017. No. S. P. 245–260. (In Rus.)

8. Starichenok V. V. Values of Belaru sians in Terms of Ideology // Scientific Works of the Republican Institute of Higher Education [Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshej shkoly]. 2019. No. 18. P. 264–271. (In Rus.) EDN: CPCDEJ

9. Shamakhov V. A. Social and Humanitarian Cooperation: Experience and Prospects // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evrazijskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2020. No. 1. P. 31–35. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2020-1-31-35

10. Yakovlev A. A. The Eurasian Econom ic Union and the Chinese “One Belt — One Road Initiative”. Opportunities for Cooperation // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk]. 2018. No. 1. P. 204–211. (In Rus .) EDN: DRZSCM. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2018-00029

11. Deutsch K. W. Political Community and the North American Area. Princeton : Princeton University Press. 2015. 244 p.

12. Etzioni A. Political Unification Revisited: on Building Supernational Communities. Lanham : Lexington Books. 2001. 412 p.

13. Garashchuk A. The Eurasian Economic Union in Search of Strategic Partners: the Gravity Effects of Integration Blocs // Panoeconomicus . 2023. Vol. 70. No. 1. P. 155–179. DOI: 10.2298/PAN190612008G

14. Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt : Suhrkamp. 1984. 674 s. (Luhmann N. Social Systems. Outline of a General Theory. Frankfurt : Suhrkamp. 1984. 674 p.). (In Germ.).

15. March J., Olsen J. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // The American Political Science Review . 1984. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 734–749.

16. Roedyati J. Conflict Management Inside EAEU to Preserve Its Forum // Journal of Economics Management and Trade. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 11. P. 64–68. DOI: 10.9734/jemt/2022/v28i111056

17. Rosenau J. N. Turbulence in World Politics. A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press. 1990. 480 p.


Review

For citations:


Bakhlova O.V., Bakhlov I.V. Interpretation of Values in the Conceptual and Strategic Documents of the EAEU Countries: The Factor of Global Turbulence. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2023;17(4):102-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-102-111

Views: 278


ISSN 2073-2929 (Print)