Political PR in International Digital Communications: The Experience of the Eurasian Media Space

Digital media has become an integral part of the political life of citizens, as an increasing number of people around the world use digital media technologies for communication. Digital media contribute to the formation of socio-political factors that raise concerns about the spread of disinformation, information disagreements and political polarization.

Aim. To analyze the tools, problems and opportunities of political PR in the context of digitalization of the media space in foreign countries and the EAEU countries.

Tasks. To give significant ideas about the concepts of “political public relations” and “political communication”; to identify factors influencing political communication processes; to present international experience in the application of political PR in the context of digitalization of media; to formulate the possibilities for the development of Eurasian integration in the context of digitalization of the media space.

Methods. The methodological basis of the scientific research was such modern general scientific research methods as: comparative analysis, statistical and structural-logical methods, content analysis of open sources of information.

Results. The paper defines the role and importance of digital media in political PR activities, identifies traditional and modern factors of influence on political activity, as well as problems in the new digital reality. To build political communications with the audience, its impact and increase engagement, political organizations use new media technologies using multimodality. In practice, the digital inequality of the world population deprives a number of people of digital communication, and as a result, the necessary conditions for participation in the political and economic life of the country. The digital divide of the EAEU countries reduces the political communicative impact on citizens’ beliefs in the need to strengthen integration processes. It seems appropriate to introduce consistency in the formation of the Eurasian integration agenda and a single digital information field to increase the political culture of civic engagement in all EAEU member states.

Conclusions. With the help of variation of resources, the necessary content is formed to create the necessary audience effect. Indeed, digital media has a number of advantages that have been proven in practice, however, political PR is influenced by the negative side of the development of digital communications — the spread of fake news, most of which cannot be traced to the source. Therefore, the transformation of digital opportunities, the distribution of political resources, the dissemination of political discourse and the structure of political opportunities in the digital age is the most relevant in the modern world. Using the example of the EAEU countries, it is proved that digitalization in the international media space causes the involvement of citizens of different countries in integration, generalization and formation of public support for the state.

1. Yevraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2023. Vol. 17. No. 3. P. 9–14. (In Russ.) EDN: FRMYRF. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-9-14

2. Kolobova E. Y., Baykova I. A. [et al.] Media Technologies of Advertising and PR Activities in the Era of Global Digitalization. St. Petersburg : SPbGIKiT, 2022, 149 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-94760-525-9. EDN: YGOXPK

3. Shomova S. A. Clown, Punch, Fool... (The Trickster’s Incarnations in the Russian Political Communication // Ethnographic Review [Etnograficheskoye obozreniye]. 2015. No. 4. P. 64–74). (In Russ.) EDN: UHCBQD

4. Barlow J. P. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace [Electronic resource] // Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from. 08.02.1996. URL: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence (accessed: 10.02.2023).

5. Béland D. Identity, Politics, and Public Policy // Critical Policy Studies. 2016. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2016.1159140

6. Bennett W. L., Segerberg A. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and Thepersonalization of Contentious Politics // Information, Communication & Society. 2012. Vol. 15. No. 5. P. 739–768. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

7. Bezemer J., Jewitt C., Diamantopoulou S. [et al.] Using a Social Semiotic Approach to Multimodality: Researching Learning in Schools, Museums and Hospitals. Bezemer, J., NCRM. 2012.

8. Denton R. E., Woodward G. C. Political Communication in America. NY : Praeger Publishers, 1998. 430 p.

9. Johnston J., Sheehan M. (Eds.). Public Relations: Theory and Practice. Rutledge, 2020. 300 p.

10. Kantola A. Cleaning Rotten Politics, Selling Exclusive Liaisons: Public Relations Consultants as Storytelling Professionals between Markets and Politics // Public Relations Inquiry. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 33–52. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X15625713

11. Krishna A., Connaughton S. L., Linabary J. R. Citizens’ Political Public Relations: Unpacking Choices, and Emergent and Deliberate Strategies in Building Trust and Relations among Groups in Conflict // Public Relations Review. 2020. Vol. 46. No. 1. P. 101–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101853

12. Lee F. L. F., Chan M., Chen H.-T. [et all.], Consumptive News Feed Curation on Social Media as Proactive Personalization: A study of Six East Asian Markets // Journalism Studies. 2019. Vol. 20. No. 15. P. 2277–2292. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1586567

13. Levenshus A. Online Relationship Management in a Presidential Campaign: A Case Study of the Obama Campaign’s Management of Its Internet-Integrated Grassroots Effort // Journal of Public Relations Research. 2010. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 313–335. DOI: 10.1080/10627261003614419

14. Lieber P. S., Golan G. J. Political Public Relations, News Management, and Agenda Indexing. In: Political Public Relations: Principles and Applications. Routledge, 2011. P. 54–74. ISBN: 9780203864173

15. Lyons B. A. Discussion Network Activation: An Expanded Approach to Selective Exposure // Media and Communication. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 32–41. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i3.2112

16. McLeod D. M., Kosicki G. M., McLeod J. M. Resurveying the Boundaries of Political Communication Effects. In: Jennings Bryant and Dolf Zillmann (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum. 2002. P. 215–268. ISBN: 9781410602428

17. Persily N. The 2016 US Election: Can Democracy Survive the Internet? // Journal of Democracy. 2017. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 63–76.

18. Sanders K. Government Communication and Political Public Relations. In book: Political Public Relations. Routledge, 2019. P. 165–186. DOI: 10.4324/9781351053143-8

19. Tandoc E. C., Lim Z. W., Ling R. Defining “Fake News”: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions // Digital Journalism. 2018. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 137–153. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143