Establishment and Cooperation of Sino-Russian Arctic Think Tanks in Universities: Context, Positioning, and Pathways

In the context of the rapid development of science and technology and the complexity of the geopolitical landscape, the Arctic region has become a frontier of international competition. Russia and China, as important participants in Arctic affairs, not only share common interests in the fields of geopolitics and economics but also possess significant potential for cooperation in maintaining stability and sustainable development in the region. In recent years, scientific and technological diplomacy has become an important tool for interstate interaction, and the construction and cooperation of Arctic think tanks at universities in Russia and China are gradually transforming into a primary format for scientific and technological diplomacy.

Aim. This article aims to explore the establishment of think tanks at universities in China and Russia in the field of Arctic research, analyze their role and positioning in scientific and technological diplomacy, and further investigate specific pathways for cooperation between universities, along with recommendations for optimizing interactions.

Methods. Through a systematic review and empirical analysis, the cooperation and establishment of think tanks in universities in China and Russia concerning Arctic issues are examined.

Results. The cooperative pathways of Arctic think tanks in Chinese and Russian universities include conducting joint scientific research and expeditions to achieve data and resource sharing; regularly holding international conferences and academic exchanges to facilitate political dialogue and knowledge transfer; utilizing research results from think tanks to provide policy recommendations to the government, supporting decision-making for both countries on Arctic issues. Additionally, cooperation among think tanks can enhance exchanges and collaborations in fields such as information technology and environmental protection, promoting joint development.

Conclusions. The research findings indicate that cooperation between the think tanks of universities in China and Russia on Arctic issues effectively promotes interaction between the two countries in areas such as politics, information technology, resource utilization, and environmental protection, providing intellectual support for the Arctic strategies of both countries and playing an active role in global governance.

1. Avdonina N. S. The Arctic Floating University completed the expedition around Novaya Zemlya // Arctic and North. 2018. No. 32. P. 146–153. (In Russ.) EDN: YLBIHR. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.32.146

2. Boyko E. Scientific diplomacy as an instrument of international cooperation in the Arctic // “Polar R eadings-2022”. International Cooperation in the Arctic and Antarctic: History and Modernity. Moscow : Paulsen Publishers, 2023. 448 p. P. 124–30. (In Russ.) EDN: JYBIDP

3. Vasilyev A. V., Zaikov K. S., Zarubina L. A. Outcomes of the Russian-Chinese Expert Seminar “Science Diplomacy in the Arctic under Global Challenges” // Arctic and North. 2024. No. 55. P. 182–195. (In Russ.) EDN: KHAFCM. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2024.55.182

4. Gutenev M. Yu., Lagutina M. L., Sergunin A. A. Russian Universities as Actors of Arctic Science Diplomacy // Higher Education in Russia. 2023. Vol. 32. No. 8–9. P. 70–88. (In Russ.) EDN: MAXTHZ. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-70-88

5. Zaika Yu. V., Riabova L. A., Sergunin A. A. Science Diplomacy in the Arctic: Platforms, Practices, New Challenges. Apatity : Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023. 192 p. ISBN: 978-5-91137-480-8. (In Russ.) EDN: AXVIBP. DOI: 10.37614/978.5.91137.480.8

6. Lobanov A. V., Ryazantzeva E. A. Saint Petersbu rg as a Center of Innovative Development of the Arctic Region (on Materials of the Exposition of the International Arctic Forum “The Arctic — Territory of Dialogue”) // Basis. 2019. No. 2 (6). P. 89–96. (In Russ.) EDN: ZIBMFF

7. Adamson M., Lalli R. Global Perspectives on Science Diplomacy: Exploring the Diplomacy-Knowledge Nexus in Contemporary Histories of Science // Centaurus. 2021. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/1600-0498.12369

8. Baogui D., Liming S., Liyun Zh. Analysis of Ways to Jointly Create Think Tanks of universities in China // Modern Education Management. 2014. No. 4. P. 8–12. (In Chinese)

9. Berkman P. A. Evolution of Science Diplomacy and its Local-Global Applications // European Foreign Affairs Review. 2019. Vol. 24. Special Issue. P. 63–79. DOI: 10.54648/eerr2019019

10. Berkman P. A., Lang M. A., Walton D. W. H. [et al.] Science Diplomacy: Science, Antarctica, and the Governance of International Spaces. Washington : Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 2011. 337 p.

11. Bo Ya. On the Construction of Think Tanks in Chinese Universities. Guiyang : Guizhou University Press, 2021. (In Chinese)

12. Fengjuan J. Research on the Construction of New Think Tanks at Chinese Universities : dissertation. Anhui University, 2017. (In Chinese)

13. Flink T., Rüffin N. The Current State of the Art of Science Diplomacy // Handbook on Science and Public Policy. 2019. P. 104–121. DOI: 10.4337/9781784715946.00015

14. Fraussen B., Halpin D. Think Tanks and Strategic Policy-Making: The Contribution of Think Tanks to Policy Advisory Systems // Policy Sciences, 2017. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 105–124. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-016-9246-0

15. Guangcai Y. Historical and Modern Aspects of the Construction of the Chinese Academic System // Bulletin of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences Series). 2008. No. 6. P. 21–28. (In Chinese)

16. Jianming L. A Brief Analysis of Russian-Chinese Cooperation in the Arctic: Framework, Interests, Policies and Opportunities // Eurasian Economy. 2019. No. 4. P. 1–19. (In Chinese)

17. Krasnyak O. National Styles in Science, Diplomacy, and Science Diplomacy: A Case Study of the United Nations Security Council P5 countries // Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. 2018. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 1–100. DOI: 10.1163/24056006-12340009

18. Krasnyak O. Science and Diplomacy. A New Dimension of International Relations, Written by Pierre-Bruno Ruffini // The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2019. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 505–507. DOI: 10.1163/1871191X-14401039

19. Legrand T., Stone D. Science Diplomacy and Transnational Governance Impact // British Politics. 2018. Vol. 13. P. 392–408. DOI: 10.1057/s41293-018-0082-z

20. Ningnin Ch., Yanhan Ch. Adjustment, Causes and Consequences of Russian Arctic Policy Against the Background of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict // Studies of Borders and Seas. 2023. No. 8 (05). P. 58–71. (In Chinese)

21. Ningning Ch., Yanghan C. Risks to China’s Arctic Interests and Ways to Overcome Them — an Analysis from the Point of View of Geopolitical Rivalry in the Arctic // Socialist Studies. 2024. No. 3. P. 153–161. (In Chinese)

22. Speth J. G. Diplomacy on Ice: Energy and the Environment in the Arctic and Antarctic : Monograph / ed. by R. Pincus, S. H. Ali. Yale University Press, 2015. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt13x1stj

23. Van Efferink L. A. S. Polar Partners or Poles Apart? On the Discourses of Two US Think Tanks on Russia’s Presence in the ‘High North’ // The Geographical Journal. 2012. Vol. 178. No. 1. P. 3–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00433.x

24. Yang Lei, Jia Zhengyu. China-Russia Arctic Cooperation: Topics and Directions // Tongfang Knowledge Network (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. 2019. No. 6. P. 119–123. (In Chinese) DOI: 10.19309/j.cnki.zyx.2019.06.020

25. Ying Ch., Wei Ya. Review of Studies on Russian-Chinese Cooperation in the Arctic // Marine Economy. 2022. No. 5. P. 12–19. (In Chinese)

26. Zhenfu L., Zhao D. Prospects for the Use of Arctic Sea Routes and Their Impact on the World Economy and Geopolitics // Eurasian economy. 2021. No. 2. P. 90–108. (In Chinese)