Maritime and Continental Contours of the Geopolitical Status of Modern Russia
EDN: SCQHHQ
Abstract
The positioning of modern Russia, which occupies most of the Eurasian continent (Northern Eurasia), is characterized by periodic rapprochement with Europe, which began in the era of Peter the Great, as well as a cooling of rel ations with the latter, as evidenced by wars, including two world wars, and military conflicts of varying intensity in the past period. At the same time, Russia’s development as a major continental power with a huge coastline and virtually unlimited access to three oceans is facing opposition from an equally important maritime power, in particular, the United States. Therefore, a mental problem arises — in Eurasia, as the core of continental civilization, is there more European or Asian? And on the other hand — to what extent are the Arctic Ocean and the Arctic seas Eurasian, associated with Eurasia as a continent or a continent? Aim. The purpose of the article is to identify the features of the positioning of Eurasia, as a continent, in the dynamics of world development in the coordinates of Europe-Asia and the contours of the formula “ocean-vis-continent”. Tasks. To achieve the goal, the following tasks are solved: to substantiate the independent position of Eurasia in the dynamics of world development, as a continent, and to identify the maritime component in the logic of Eurasian architecture. Methods. The work uses a methodological approach of strategic planning in combination with the tools of spatial economics and the Western version of the latter, known as the theory of new economic geography. This allows us to build the main contours of the Eurasian architecture. Conclusions. Modern Russia, as an original state-civilization, a vast Eurasian and Euro-Pacific power, creates the logic and geographical configuration of Eurasia as a continent with an integral maritime component in the space of three oceans - the Arctic, Pacific and Atlantic.
About the Author
S. Yu. KozmenkoRussian Federation
Sergey Yu. Kozmenko, Professor, Chief Researcher at the Institute of Economic Problems named after G. P. Luzin — a separate subdivision of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Federal Research Center KSC RAS”, Doctor of Science (Economics)
Apatity
References
1. Brusnitsyn, V. N. The Arctic i n US Politics // Collected Naval. 2024. No. 1 (2122). P. 59–67. (In Russ.). EDN: MQNWEC.
2. Bykov, O. N. Geopolitical Status of Russia (in 2 books). Book 1. Moscow : IMEMO, 2015. 200 p. ISBN: 978-5-9535-0434-8. (In Russ.). EDN: UDFNVR.
3. Ivashov, L. G. Geopolitics of Russian civilization. Moscow : Institute of Russian Civilization, 2015. 800 p. (In Russ.). EDN: XDCIJT.
4. Ivashov, L. G. Geopolitical Drama of Russia. Moscow : Arguments of the Week, 2021. 528 p. ISBN: 978-5-6046510-4-9. (In Russ.).
5. Kefeli, I. F. Eurasian Civilization: From Idea to Modern Discourse // Eurasian Integration: Eco nomics, Law, Politics. 2021. V. 15, No. 2. P. 12–25. (In Russ.). EDN: LFJFIX. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2021-02-12-25.
6. Kozmenko, S. Yu The Modern Gambit in the Eurasian Version of the “Great Game” // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2022. Vol. 16, No. 4 (42 ). P. 121–129. (In Russ.). EDN: OMSIBS. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-04-121-129.
7. Kozmenko, S. Yu., Kozmenko, A. S. The Arctic Geo-Economy: Mobility of Strategic Oil Resources at the End of Globalization // Arctic and North. 2022. No. 49. P. 38–54. (In Russ.). EDN: SFRCES. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2022.49.38.
8. Kolomb, F. X. Naval warfare, its basic principles and experience. Moscow — Saint Petersburg : AST; Terra Fantastica, 2003. 668 p. ISBN: 5-17-016752-0. (In Russ.).
9. Mahan, A. T. Influence of Sea Power upon History. 1660–1783. Saint Petersburg : Terra Fantastica, 2002. P. 634. ISBN: 5-7921-0467-0. (In Russ.).
10. Mahan, A. T. The Influence upon the French Revolution and Empire. Saint Peterburg : Terra Fantastica, 2002. (In Russ.).
11. Savitsky, P. N. Eurasianism. Fundamentals of Eurasianism / ed. by A. G. Dugin. Moscow : Arktogeya-Center, 2002. 624 p. (In Russ.).
12. Savitsky, P. N. Scientific Tasks of Eurasianism. Articles and letters / ed. by K. B. Ermishina. Moscow : House of Russian Abroad named after A. Solzhenitsyn. Vikm-M, 2018. 687 p. (In Russ.).
13. Soviet Civilization and the Eurasian Idea: Two Stories Spanning a Century (on the 100th Annive rsary of the Formation of the USSR and the Establishment of Eurasianism) : coll. monogra ph / ed. by I. F. Kefeli. St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 2022. 532 p. (In Russ.) EDN: APWULA.
14. Trubetskoi, N. S. Eurasianism. Pan-Eurasian nationalism. Us and others. Мoscow : Direkt-Media, 2023. 132 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kennedy, P. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. New York : Random House. 1987. 540 p. ISBN: 0-394-54674-1.
16. Mackinder, H. J. Democratic Ideals and Reality. New York : Henry Holt and Co., 1942.
17. Mackinder, H. J. The Geographical Pivot of History // The Geographical Journal. 1904. Vol. 23, No. 4 (Apr., 1904). P. 421–37. DOI: 10.2307/1775498.
18. Mackinder, H. J. The Round World and the Winning of Peace // Foreign Affairs. Vol. 21, No. 4 (Jul., 1943). P. 595–605. DOI: 10.2307/20029780.
19. Wallerstein, I. M. The Politics of the World-Economy. The States, the Movements and the Civilizations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1984. 191 p. ISBN: 9780521277600.
Review
For citations:
Kozmenko S.Yu. Maritime and Continental Contours of the Geopolitical Status of Modern Russia. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2025;19(2):23-32. (In Russ.) EDN: SCQHHQ