Preview

EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics

Advanced search

Mutual Trade of BRICS Countries in the Logic of Integration Cooperation

EDN: SHMHCH

Abstract

The BRICS is playing an increasingly important role as a new international initiative to counter growing global economic instability. To achieve that mission and to reach the highest form of economic integration — an introduction of a single currency system — the BRICS countries need to start by improving mutual trade relation, which is a prerequisite for creating a common capital and labor markets, which, in turn, is necessary for the formation of a strong economic union. Aim. The aim of the article is to explain a crucial role of improving BRICS mutual trade for further development of economic integration among the member states. The research hypothesis is the following: for strengthening the BRICS integration the member states should change the trade structure in a way of increasing the share of value added commodities in the mutual trade. It will make the complementarity between the countries robust and creates the ground floor for introduction of the own currency and international calculation systems. Tasks. The research tasks comprises analyses of the BRICS’ countries position in the world trade, specifically in merchandise trade, their export potential, the structure of their mutual merchandise trade. Methods. Methodologically the research is based on the theories of convergence and the international division of labour; theories of the “national comparative advantageous”; spatial development of national economy; theories of catching up growth. Statistical, empirical and comparative analyses represent the main methods of the given research. Results. Results of the research are the following: China plays a key role in the production and trade of final manufacturing goods, while the rest of the BRICS countries specialize primarily on the export of raw materials. Moreover, while China’s export is oriented primarily to third country rather than to the BRICS market, the rest of the BRICS countries rely heavily on the import of Chinese goods. The significant gap in the level of economic development of the BRICS countries hinders centripetal interaction between them. Conclusions. In conclusion the author offers a number of recommendations for improving the scale and scope of trade cooperation among BRICS countries. In addition to expanding traditional export it is very important to change its structure towards the production and trade of more technologically complex goods with higher value added. When all BRICS countries move towards achieving this strategic goal, it will deepen their complementarity, and allow less developed member states to catch up with the leading BRICS countries, thereby making this integration more robust and convergent. In this way imports from third countries will be replaced by goods produced and sold on the BRICS market, which can also strengthen mutual trade and economic cooperation between the BRICS countries.

About the Author

I. V. Boiko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Nord-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Irina V. Boiko, Doctor of Science (Economy), Profess or

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Boiko, I. V. Spatial and Technological Diversification of the Russian Economy // Administrative Consulting. 2018. No. 6. P. 68–76. (In Russ.). EDN: UUFOIZ. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-5-68-76.

2. Boiko, I. V. Economics as a System. The Basic Principles. INFRA-Inzheneria, 2025. 288 p. (In Russ.).

3. Morozkina, A. K., Skryabina, V. U. BRICS and Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Prospects for Trade with Least Developed Countries // International Organisations Research Journal. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 1. P. 85–106. (In Russ.). EDN: D FRXJU. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2021-01-04.

4. Pogodin, S. N., Yagya, T. S. Trade and Economic Cooperation within the Framework of BRICS // Eurasian Integration: E conomics, Law, Politics. 2021. Vol. 15, No. 3. P. 44–54. (In Russ.). EDN: GSKZYY. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2021-03-44-54.

5. Rastopchina, U. L., Kovaleva, E. I., Zhokovskii, A. D. Industrial Development and Comparative Review of BRICS Specialization // International Trade and Trade Policy. 2024. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 64–80. (In Russ.). EDN: MAUDTJ. DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2024-1-64-80.

6. Revenko, L. S., Revenko, N. S. BRICS Mutual Trade: Potential and Development Patterns // Russian Foreign Economic Journal. 2018. No. 10. P. 70–81. (In Russ.). EDN: YMCSLJ.

7. Yakovlev, P. P. The BRICS Enlargement and the New Stage in the Battle between the Global Alternatives // The Prospects. 2023. No. 4. P. 7–20. (In Russ.). EDN: DNNTXZ. DOI: 10.32726/2411-3417-2023-4-7-20.

8. Afota, Amandine, Burban, Valentin, Diev, Pavel [et al.]. Expansion of BRICS: What Are the Potential Consequences for the Global Economy // Bulletin de la Banque de France 250/2 — January-February. 2024. URL: https://www.banque-france.fr/system/files/2024-02/BDF250-2_BRICS_EN.pdf .

9. Anderson, Tim, Yulianti, Dina. The Developmental Case for BRICS // Global South Review. March, 2024. P. 45–64. DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.90735.

10. Filho, J. F. D. S., Ferreira dos Santos, G., Ribeiro, L. C. D. S., de Cerqueira, R. B., Lima, L. L. Global Value Chains and intra-BRICs Trade in Value-Added // Journal of Government and Economics. Winter 2024. Vol. 16. 100127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jge.2024.100127.

11. Kumar, S., Shahid, A., Agarwal, M. Is BRICS Expansion Significant for Global Trade and GDP? // BRICS Journal of Economics. 2024. No. 5 (4). P. 5–36. DOI: 10.3897/brics-econ.5.e139877.


Review

For citations:


Boiko I.V. Mutual Trade of BRICS Countries in the Logic of Integration Cooperation. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2025;19(2):33-43. (In Russ.) EDN: SHMHCH

Views: 14


ISSN 2073-2929 (Print)