Tourism Transformation within the Sustainable Development Paradigm

Amidst the external restrictions, domestic tourism in Russia is actively developing. While this creates new opportunities for regional development, it also poses certain risks to the sustainable development of tourism destinations, particularly in the areas of ecology and environmental protection. In some countries, tourism development is moving along a sustainable tourism trajectory, under which a portion of the funds generated by tourism-driven economic development is directed toward reducing the negative impact of tourism on the environment and local communities. Aim. Firstly, to characterize current state of tourism industry in Russia, in terms of sustainable development. Secondly, to analyze international practices in sustainable tourism and identify limitations to sustainable tourism development in Russia. Finaly, to propose a series of measures to support the development of sustainable tourism in Russia. Methods. To assess tourism development in Russia, a comprehensive systematic approach was implemented, integrating comparative, statistical, and spatial-geographical methods. To assess sustainable tourism practices, a critical and retrospective analysis of scientific publications on the topic was conducted, along with a detailed review of international and Russian regulatory documents governing the formation and development of the tourism and recreation industry. Conclusions. When developing measures, we should: consider the impact of the increased tourist flow on the sustainable development of destinations, while assessing their capacity; redistribute tourist flows; develop tourism infrastructure and improve transport accessibility; expand the range of tools for developing sustainable tourism, etc.

1. Bronzini, R., Ciana, E., Montaruli, F. Tourism and Local Growth in Italy // Regional Studies. 2022. Vol. 56 (1). P. 140–154. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1910649.

2. Mahadevan, R., Amir, H., Nugroho, A. Regional Impacts of Tourism-Led Growth on Poverty and Income Inequality: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis for Indonesia // Tourism Economics. 2017. Vol. 23, No. 3. P. 614–631. DOI: 10.5367/te.2015.0534.

3. Neuts, B. Tourism and Urban Economic Growth: A Panel Analysis of German Cities // Tourism Economics: The Business and Finance of Tourism and Recreation. 2020. Vol. 26, No. 3. P. 519–527. DOI: 10.1177/1354816619833553.

4. Ozturk, I., AI-Mulali, U., Saboori, B. Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: The Role of Tourism and Ecological Footprint // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015. Vol. 23. P. 1916– 1928. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x.

5. Redclift, M. 2005. Sustainable Development (1987–2005): An Oxymoron Comes of Age // Sustainable Development. 2005. Vol. 13. P. 212–227. DOI: 10.1002/sd.281.

6. Romao, J. Tourism, Smart Specialisation, Growth, and Resilience // Annals of Tourism Research. 2020. Vol. 84. P. 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102995.

7. Sharpley, R. Tourism, Sustainable Development and the Theoretical Divide: 20 Years on // Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2020. Vol. 28, No. 11. P. 1932–1946. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1779732.

8. Danish, Wang, Z. Dyna mic Relationship between Tourism Economic Growth and Environmental Quality // Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2019. Vol. 26 (11). P. 1928–1943. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1526293.

9. Xu, N., Li, H. Towards Management of Sustainable Tourism Development in Coastal Destinations of the Bohai Rim: Insights from a Tourism Carrying Capacity Analysis // Discover Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 168. P. 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-00951-1.

10. Zuo, B., Huang, S. Revisiting the Tourism-Led Economic Growth Hypothesis: The Case of China // Journal of Travel Research. 2018. Vol. 57. P. 151–163. DOI: 10.1177/0047287516686725.