Implementation of Innovative Projects in the Customs and Logistics Sphere As a Factor for Russia’s Integration into Global Value Chains
Abstract
Under the current conditions of globalization of economic development, the presence of a state in the global economic landscape is manifested in the following main forms: international trade; embedding a national economy into the global value chains; participation in integration economic associations; and the formation of a unified (coordinated) policy in branches and fields of activity of the integration association. The present study is aimed at assessing situations of Russia’s participation in global value chains, and at reviewing the implementation of innovation projects in the spheres of customs and logistics. The latter is a key factor for integrating the country into global chains. The main directions are formulated of state support and promotion of enterprises in value chains they create (improvement of infrastructure, improvement of customs policy, development and implementation of innovation projects in the field of customs and logistics). The main problems are identified for Russia’s customs and logistics, including the imperfection of IT-technologies created for customs authorities and logistics companies. A model is proposed of an automatic software complex for the risk management system, which makes it possible to simulate the ways of solving these problems through the usage of Internet data.
About the Authors
Evgenia A. KuklinaRussian Federation
Chair of Business Informatics, Doctor of Science (Economy), Full Professor
Saint-Petersburg
Natalya P Stafeeva
Russian Federation
Graduate student of the Chair of Economiy
St. Petersburg
References
1. Исследование структуры создания добавленной стоимости на примере отдельных отраслей, роли импортных оборудования и комплектующих, ситуации с встраиванием в глобальные цепочки. Отчет ЦЭФИР (научный руководитель проекта: проф. Волчкова Н. А.).
2. Куклина Е.А., Лесханов А.Б. Возможности Республики Казахстан в формировании единой агропромышленной политики Евразийского экономического союза // Материалы IX Международной научно-практической конференции «Государство и бизнес. Современные проблемы экономики» 25–27 апреля 2018 г. Т. 2. СПб., 2018. С. 78–83.
3. Куклина Е.А., Стафеева Н.П. К вопросу управления рисками инновационного проекта (на примере таможенной сферы) // Управленческое консультирование. 2016. № 9. С. 106–113.
4. Стафеева Н.П. Оценка современного состояния и перспектив развития транспортно-логистической системы Российской Федерации в контексте управления рисками // Управленческое консультирование. 2018. № 3. С. 157–165.
5. Мешкова Т., Моисеичев Е. Анализ глобальных цепочек создания стоимости: возможности Форсайт-исследований // Форсайт. 2016. Т. 10. № 1. С. 69–82.
6. Balassa B. Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage // Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. 1965, 33 (2), P. 99–123.
7. Hummels D., Ishii J., Yi K.-M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Staff Report of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 1999.
8. Hummels D., Ishii J., Yi K.-M. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade // Journal of International Economics. Vol. 54. 2001. P. 75–96.
9. Gaston N. The impact of international trade and protection on Australian manufacturing employment //Australian Economic Papers. 1998. V. 37. N 2. С. 119–136.
10. Daudin G., Rifflart Ch., Schweisguth D. Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy? 2009. Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Economiques (French Economic Observatory) Working Paper. N 2009-18, July 2009.
11. Kunimoto K. Typology of Trade Intensity Indices // Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics. 1977. P. 15–32.
12. Torrens R. An Essay on the External Corn Trade, 1815.
Review
For citations:
Kuklina E.A., Stafeeva N.P. Implementation of Innovative Projects in the Customs and Logistics Sphere As a Factor for Russia’s Integration into Global Value Chains. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2018;(2):44-51. (In Russ.)