Management Quality and Information Quality: Some Results of 2020 for the Post-Soviet Space
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-03-15-21
Abstract
The foreign policy of some states does not always lend itself to rational explanation. The antithesis of the all-embracing rationality model was the model of incrementalism, first proposed by C. Lindblom, professor at Yale University. It was he who first noted that in the decision-making process there is a constant lack of knowledge, information, resources; and the role of uncertainty is great in the internal and external environment, which is difficult to control. However, even when ideally informed, politicians can make irrational decisions. Incrementalism as a theoretical approach draws attention to situations where decisions are not based on available and verified information. Political processes and relevant management decisions in Armenia and Belarus in 2020 indicate that the information quality and the management quality do not always correlate with each other.
About the Authors
V. A. ShamakhovRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Director, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
Saint Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Moscow
References
1. Barsukov N. S. “Echo cameras” on the Internet: an illustration of the “echo effect” on the example of Brexit // State and citizens in the electronic environment. Issue 2. SPb. 2018. (In rus)
2. Bayandina E. D. Political dimension of the budgetary process: the theory of incrementalism // Management consulting. 2011. No. 3. (In rus)
3. Bordachev T. V. Europe and Russia in the post-coronavirus world [Electronic resource] // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. International relationships. 2020. Vol. 13. Issue 4. P. 438. URL: https://doi. org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.401 (date of access: 13.05.2021). (In rus)
4. Klimova I. I. The concept of incrementalism and its evolution // Financial journal. 2011. No. 4 (10). P. 63. (In rus)
5. Korybko E., Haddad H. Chaos theory, change in the world system and hybrid wars [Electronic resource] // Comparative politics. 2016. No. 7 (4 (25)). P. 25–35. URL: https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7- 4(25)-25-35 (date accessed: 05/13/2021). (In rus)
6. Kuzmin S. S. Incrementalism as a strategic response to the uncertainty of the external environment // Issues of Economics and Law. 2015. No. 3. P. 73–77. (In rus)
7. Rusakov A. Yu. Echo chambers in modern mass culture // Bulletin of SPbGIK. 2019. No. 2 (39). P. 11–15.
8. Starkin S. V. Problems of typologization of intelligence information in the American theoretical discourse // Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University. N. I. Lobachevsky. International relationships. Political science. Regional studies. 2011. No. 1. P. 334. (In rus)
9. Hughes-Wilson J. The History of Catastrophic Failures of Military Intelligence. Ekaterinburg : Gonzo, 2014. P. 284. (In rus)
10. Tsygankov P. A. Graham Allison on National Security Decision Making Models // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2000. No. 6. P. 247. (In rus)
11. Arthur W. B. Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality // American Economic Review. May 1994. Vol. 84. No. 2. P. 406.
12. Kent S. The Need for an Intelligence Literature // Studies in Intelligence. 1955. No. 1; Kent S. Strategic Intelligence for American World Policy. Princeton, N J : Princeton University Press, 1949.
13. Lindblom C. E. The Science of “Muddling Through” // Public Administration Review. Spring, 1959. Vol. 19. No. 2. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Society for Public Administration. P. 79–88.
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. Management Quality and Information Quality: Some Results of 2020 for the Post-Soviet Space. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2021;15(3):15-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-03-15-21