Preview

EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics

Advanced search

Neoliberal Postmodernity and Hyperimperialism

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-04-49-60

Abstract

The article describes transformation of the ideology of liberalism and the associated practices of economic domination at the transition stage from the socio-philosophical Modern paradigm to Postmodern paradigm.
Aim. Identify the link between the rhetoric of modern liberalism, Postmodern paradigms and trends in the evolution of the world economic system.
Tasks. Consider the historical conditions for the formation of liberal and neo liberal ideology; determine the place of neoliberal discourse in the ideological landscape of our time; correlate it with other relevant discourses that claim to explain economic, social and cultural processes; to analyze the features of modern practices of developed countries economic domination in relations with the others world countries.
Methods. The article, using logical analysis, establishes the main features of modern liberal ideology, allowing us to talk about a new stage in the history of the liberalism development. Comparative analysis allows us to find out the points of liberalism convergence at this stage with other ideological directions in present time. However, statistical analysis reveals important economic factors impeding the reduction of the distance between developed and developing countries.
Results. The study showed that to date, the liberal discourse has undergone significant changes, which allows us to talk about a completely new stage in the development of liberal ideology. On the one hand, it was significantly influenced by a general paradigm shift that affected the entire spectrum of socio-economic thought in the 20th century, which we define as an intensifying transition from the Modern paradigm to the Postmodern paradigm. On the other hand, the analysis of the historical path of imperialism and its inherent practices of domination also allows us to talk about its sig nificant transformation in the conditions of the post-industrial economy and the information society. Parallel consideration of these aspects (ideological and practical), the continuous correlation of theory with economic realities allows the authors to define such a complex concept as hyper imperialism. This term is proposed to be used to refer to a specific form of imperialism in a post-industrial manner. At the same time, the intrinsic inseparability of various types of expansion — economic, ideological and, more broadly, civilizational — is taken as its key feature.
Conclusion. In the context of a large-scale socio-economic and ideological transformation of a global nature, the need for new forms and means of confronting economic hegemony and finding a path to independent economic and social development is increasing.

About the Authors

O. N. Misko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Oleg N. Misko, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of Economics of the Faculty of Economics and Finance, Doctor of Science (Economics)

Saint Petersburg



P. I. Sysoev
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Philipp I. Sysoev, Masters Student, Speciality Economic and Mathematics Methods

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Bauman Z. The Individualized Society. Moscow, Publ. House Logos. 2005. (In Rus.)

2. Baudrillard J. In Shadow of the Silent. The end of the Social. Ekaterinburg : Publ. House of Ural University. 2000. (In Rus.)

3. Baudrillard J. The Spirit of Terrorism. Moscow : Publ. House Ripol Classic. 2017. (In Rus.)

4. Wallerstein I. After Liberalism. Moscow : Editorial URSS. 2003. (In Rus.)

5. Vasilieva J., Kryazheva-Chernaya P. and Sysoev P. Statistics of R & D Expenditure and Patenting in Developed and Developing Countries // Materials of the International Scientific-practical Conference [Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii]. Samara : SIC “Volga Scientific Corporation”. 01.30.2018. (In Rus.)

6. Vattimo G. Transparent Society. Moscow : Publ. House Logos. 2002. (In Rus.)

7. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Moscow : Publ. House Praxis. 2011. (In Rus.)

8. Greengard S. The Internet of Things. Moscow : Publ. House Alpina Publisher. 2017. (In Rus.)

9. Deleuze G. and Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Ekaterinburg : Publ. House U-Faktoriya. 2007. (In Rus.)

10. Dugin A. Noomachia: The War of the Mind. The Logos of Europe: Mediterranean Civilization in Time and Space. Moscow : Publ. House Academic Project. 2014. (In Rus.)

11. Dugin A. Postphilosophy. Three Paradigms in the History of thought : A Course of Lectures at the Philosophy Faculty of Moscow state University. Moscow : Publ. House the Eurasian Movement. 2009. (In Rus.)

12. Ionin L. Political Correctness: A Brave New World. Moscow : Publ. House Ad Marginem Press. 2012. (In Rus.)

13. Katasonov V. Economic Theory of the Slavophiles and Contemporary Russia. Moscow : Institute of Russian civilization, Publ. House Oxygen. 2016. (In Rus.)

14. Kukatas C. The Liberal Archipelago. Moscow : Publ. House Thought. 2011. (In Rus.)

15. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern. Saint Petersburg : Publ. House of the European University in St. Petersburg. 2006. (In Rus.)

16. Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition. Saint Petersburg : Publ. House Aleteya. 2016. (In Rus.)

17. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Moscow : Publ. House Ad Marginem Press. 2016. (In Rus.)

18. Popper C. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Moscow : Phoenix, International Fund “Cultural Initiative”. 1992. (In Rus.)

19. Russel B. A History of Western Philosophy. Moscow : Publ. House AST. 2017. (In Rus.)

20. Rothbard M. For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. Moscow : New Publishing. 2009. (In Rus.)

21. Feuerabend P. Science in a Free Society. Moscow : Publ. House AST. 2010. (In Rus.)

22. Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom. Moscow : New Publishing. 2016. (In Rus.)

23. Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Moscow : Publ. House Ad Marginem Press. 2016. (In Rus.)

24. Hayek F. The Road to Serfdom. Moscow : Publ. House AST. 2017. (In Rus.)

25. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow : Publ. House Eksmo. 2017. (In Rus.)

26. Baudrillard J. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London, SAGE Publications Ltd. 1998.

27. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. 2005.

28. Foucault M. The Birth of Biopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan. 2008.

29. Omae K. The End of Nation State and Rise of Region Economies. HarperCollinsPublishers. 1996.

30. Wallerstein I. Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization. Verso. 1996.


Review

For citations:


Misko O.N., Sysoev P.I. Neoliberal Postmodernity and Hyperimperialism. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2021;15(4):49-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-04-49-60

Views: 417


ISSN 2073-2929 (Print)