Specifics of the Political and Legal Documents of the EAEU with Third Countries
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-04-61-66
Abstract
This study examines “soft power” international activity instruments of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) with third countries within the framework of transregionalism on the basis of program documents and institutional formats. The study describes the experience of China, where soft power is used to achieve economic power and can act as a source of both attractiveness and pressure.
Aim. The study to determine the feasibility of applying the concept of “soft power” in the field of international cooperation of the EAEU with third countries on the basis of program documents and institutional mechanisms.
Tasks. The author determines the conceptual foundations of international cooperation between the EAEU and third countries, considers the EAEU program documents in the field of international cooperation, identifies the institutional formats of the EAEU in the field of interaction with third countries.
Methods. The study uses methods of studying documents and content analysis to identify the competent authorities of the EAEU and existing institutional formats in the field of international cooperation. At the root of the EAEU’s activities, two principles can be traced: supranational, which is responsible for the functioning of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC), and interstate, when member states can also be involved in negotiations.
Results. This study shows that the EAEU implements four institutional formats for interaction with third countries, namely the Free Trade Zone; Interim agreement leading to the formation of a free trade area; Preferential and non-preferential trade agreements; Memorandum of understanding. Thus, the highest format of interaction between the EAEU and third countries is the Free Trade Zone. The choice of a specific institutional format with third countries is determined not only by historical and geopolitical characteristics, but rather a comprehensive analysis of the foreign policy and capabilities of a particular country.
Conclusions. The EAEU’s international activities in the field of interaction with third countries are aimed not only at deepening and simplifying trade and economic cooperation, but also making it possible to promote soft power in the international global space through tools such as science, technology, innovation.
About the Author
E. K. BerezinaRussian Federation
Elizaveta K. Berezina, Senior Specialist of the Center for International Project Activities under the Department of International Cooperation
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Berezina E. K., Toropygin A. V. EAEU Expands International Cooperation: Latin American Trend // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2021. No. 3. P. 43–57. (In Rus.)
2. Lebedeva M. M., Kuznetsov D. A. Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects // Polis. Political Studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2019. No. 5. P. 71–84. (In Rus.)
3. Lobanova D. A. Conceptual Approaches to Definition of Power in IR Theory // International Trends [Mezhdunarodnye processi]. Vol. 15. No. 2 (49). P. 77–88. (In Rus.)
4. Kheyfets B. A. Prospects for the Development of the EAEU as a New Format of Interaction with the Outside World // Economics and Society [Obshchestvo i ekonomika]. 2018. No. 12. P. 39–53. (In Rus.)
5. Breslin S. The Soft Notion of China’s ‘Soft Power’ [Electronic resource] // Asia Programme Paper: ASP PP. 2011. No. 3. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Asia/0211pp_breslin.pdf (date accessed: 26.11.2021).
6. Nye J. S. Jr. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power // The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2008. Vol. 616. Issue 1. P. 94–109.
7. Nye J. S. Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in Worlds Politics. New York : Public Affairs Press, 2005.
Review
For citations:
Berezina E.K. Specifics of the Political and Legal Documents of the EAEU with Third Countries. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2021;15(4):61-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2021-04-61-66