Russia’s Arctic Strategy in the Greater Eurasian Partnership

This study focuses on the role of the Arctic Strategy of Russia in the Great Eurasian Partnership.
Aim. The study aims to identify the features of the Arctic Strategy of Russia in the Great Eurasian Partnership.
Tasks. The development of principles of geopolitical forecasting and work with big data, with the aim of synchronizing the integration processes contradictory in nature and interests of the actors in Greater Eurasia, identifying the features of the geopolitical regionalization of Eurasia, and analyzing the global security analytics of the Great Eurasian Partnership in the coming “digital era”.
Methods. The transition from the “analog” to the “digital era” at the beginning of the 21st century meant an essentially revolution in the data itself, which was associated with the emergence of their new quality — predictive. The methodology for research and forecasting the prospects of Eurasian integration is modeling the multi-agent interaction of geopolitical factors of coalitions based on mathematical game theory. The strategy of transition to a polycentric world order implies the need to move from “geopolitical fiction” to geopolitics, based on mathematical modeling of global geopolitics processes using game theory methods.
Results. The geopolitical regionalization of Eurasia is a challenge to time. On the expanses of the Eurasian continent, several multi-format long-term “Eurasian projects” are increasingly clearly emerging. This is, firstly, the Eurasian Economic Union, secondly, the Chinese One Belt-One Way and, thirdly, Indo-Pacifica. The Russian Arctic is a region of the Great Eurasian Partnership. The tasks of the modern Arctic policy of Russia are focused on ensuring the priority growth of raw materials exports and industrial development of the Arctic territories, rather than on solving the problems of improving the quality of life of the local population, although in the Russian Arctic strategy until 2035 these tasks are formulated quite correctly.
Conclusion. The analytics of the Eurasian partnership and the wording of expert assessments should be formed on the basis not only of political discourse, but also of exact sciences. In modern conditions, the development of scenario projects for the construction of the Great Eurasian Partnership, which includes the Greater Arctic (which, in turn, require an independent theoretical and methodological study), involves the full use of the apparatus of mathematical geopolitics (game theory), scenario modeling and big data technologies.

1. Biev A. A. The Main Directions of the Formation of a Network of Transport and Energy Infrastructure in the Arctic Regions of Russia // Regional Problems of Economic Transformation [Regional’nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki]. 2017. No. 11 (85). Р. 66–72. (In Rus.)

2. Great Eurasian Partnership — New Horizons of Cooperation : Thematic collection / Under the common. Ed. I. A. Maksimtseva. Saint Petersburg : Publishing House SPbSEU, 2021. 159 p. (In Rus.)

3. Gizatullina O. M. Analysis of Transport Infrastructure of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation // Economic Sciences [Ekonomicheskie nauki]. 2020. No. 11 (192). P. 273–279. (In Rus.)

4. Glazyev S. Yu. Beyond the Horizon of the End of History. Moscow : Prospect, 2021. 416 p.

5. To the Great Ocean — 5: from the Turn to t he East to Greater Eurasia // Report of the Valdai International Discussion Club. Moscow. September 2017. 47 p. (In Rus.)

6. Kefeli I. F. Asfatronika: On the Way to the Theory of Global Security : monograph. St. Petersburg : Publishing House NWIM of RANEPA, 2020. 228 p. (In Rus.)

7. Kefeli I. F., Migunova O. V., Nikolaenko A. V. Great Eurasian Partnership — Geopolitical Realities, Prospects, Forecasts // Great Eurasian Partnership — New Horizons of Cooperation: Thematic collection / under the general edition of I. A. Maksimtsev. Saint Petersburg : Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 2021. 159 p. (In Rus.)

8. Leksin V. N., Porfiriev B. N. Russian Arctic: Logic and Paradoxes of Change // Problems of Forecasting [Problemy prognozirovaniya]. 2019. No. 6. Р. 4–21. (In Rus.)

9. Maining R. US Indo-Pacific Strategy: Myths and Reality // Valdai Notes [Valdaiskie zapiski]. 2018. No. 89. (In Rus.)

10. Northern Sea Route: History, Regions, Projects, Fleet and Fuel Supply / ed. A. Klimentiev. Moscow : Center for Energy of the Moscow School of Management Skolkovo, 2020. 104 p. (In Rus.)

11. Serova N. A., Serova V. A. Transport Infrastructure of the Russian Arctic: Specifics Features and Development Prospects // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2021. Vol. 32. No. 2. P. 213–219. DOI:10.1134/S107570072102009X

12. Hansong Li. The “Indo-Pacific”: Intellectual Origins and International Visions in Global Contexts. Modern Intellectual History (2021). P. 1–27. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 June 2021. doi:10.1017/S1479244321000214