The Eurasian Vector as a Priority of Russia’s Parliamentary Diplomacy
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-01-16-28
Abstract
The article discusses certain special aspects of Russia’s parliamentary diplomacy in the context of global confrontation with the West. It demonstrates that the Eurasian vector of the parliamentary dimension should become the priority thereof. The article researches multilateral and bilateral inter-parliamentary relations aimed at the formation of Eurasian law and the creation of conditions for functioning of Eurasian courts and arbitration tribunals. Certain features of the work of Eurasian parliamentary institutions are revealed, such as: the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly, IPA CIS, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia on economic, political, military, humanitarian integration in the post-Soviet territory.
Aim. Disclosure of the content of the Eurasian vector of Russia’s parliamentary diplomacy as a priority dimension in the context of global confrontation with the West.
Tasks. Analyze features of the Western and Eurasian vectors of parliamentary diplomacy of Russia; explore forms and methods of parliamentary diplomacy in the post-Soviet territory; determine ways to strengthen the role of the parliamentary dimension in the processes of Eurasian integration.
Methods. Systematic approach, comparative analysis, compilation of the best practices.
Results. The study showed the need for a transition to bilateral forms of inter-parliamentary cooperation between Russia and unfriendly countries of the West and the effectiveness of multilateral cooperation with the countries of the East in order to develop Eurasian integration. The relevance of creating a parliamentary dimension in the EAEU and completing the formation of parliamentary institutions in the CSTO and the Union State has been substantiated.
About the Authors
M. I. KrotovRussian Federation
Mikhail I. Krotov, Professor of the Academic Department of Foreign Policy of Russia and CIS Countries, PhD in Economics, Professor
A. A. Sereda
Russian Federation
Anatoly A. Sereda, Lecturer at the Academic Department of Foreign Policy of Russia and CIS Countries
References
1. Belekov I. I., Kalashnikov L. I., Krotov M. I. On the Humanitarian Vector in the Present-Day International Politics of the Russian Federation (Russia, Moscow). Problems of Modern Economics [Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki]. 2019; (2 (70)): 6–10. (In Rus.)
2. Glazyev S. Yu. With Mobilization — by the Inertia of Liberal Laziness. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2022; 16 (3): 9–10. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-03-9-10
3. Kosachev K. I. Parliame ntary Diplomacy in the Multipolar World. Dialogue: Politics, Law, Economics [Dialog: politika, pravo, ekonomika]. 2017; (1 (4)): 26–31. (In Rus.)
4. Krotov M. I. Eurasian Integration — an Answer to the Model of Western Globalization. Razvedchik [Razvedchik]. 2022; (1): 18–21. (In Rus.)
5. Krotov M. I. Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union in the Context of Global Economic Confrontation. Problems of Modern Economics [Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki]. 2022; (2): 9–14. (In Rus.)
6. Likhachev V. Parliamentary Diplomacy [Electronic resource]. International Affairs [Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’]. 2009; (2). URL: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/122 (accessed: 10.02.2023). (In Rus.)
7. Sherimkulov M. Sh. Parliaments for Peace. Lessons Learned from Peacekeeping Activities of the InterParliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth. Bishkek, 1998. 320 p.
Review
For citations:
Krotov M.I., Sereda A.A. The Eurasian Vector as a Priority of Russia’s Parliamentary Diplomacy. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2023;17(1):16-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-01-16-28