Some Peculiarities of Establishing the Legal Status of Military Volunteers in the EAEU and BRICS Member States
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-02-81-89
EDN: KKGEJB
Abstract
The article deals with the peculiarities of legal regulation in the EAEU and BRICS member countries, enshrining the status of volunteers who joined the armed forces of the state, the procedure and conditions of such participation and participation in armed (military) conflicts on behalf of the state. Aim. The purpose of the article is to study the legal regulation in the EAEU and BRICS member countries defining the status of volunteers who joined the armed forces of the state.
Tasks. To characterize and identify the peculiarities of the legal status of persons participating in volunteer formations of the armed forces of the EAEU and BRICS member countries. To consider the new for modern Russia legal regulation that established the status of volunteers participating in a special military operation.
Method. In the process of the research the set tasks were solved by the author with the use of general scientific (historical, dialectical, systematic, logical, method of analysis) and legal (comparative-legal, sociological, axiological) methods of research.
Results. In most countries, the establishment of the legal status of a volunteer, including social guarantees, depends directly on the country’s involvement in a particular armed conflict or external threats that result in the need for the state to strengthen its military power and, consequently, for persons to volunteer for military service. Armenia and Russia are prime examples of such countries. Over the past two years, Russian legislation has gone a long way towards defining the legal status of volunteers.
Conclusions. Analyzing the legal regulation enshrining the legal status of volunteers of the armed forces of the countries under study, it is necessary to note several directions. Thus, in fact, in all BRICS and EAEU member countries considered in the study, the participation of volunteers in the armed forces is regulated by legislation. The only country whose legislation does not provide for the participation of volunteers in the country’s armed forces is the BRICS member country South Africa. In analyzing the legal regulation of the EAEU member countries, it should be noted that the legislation of these countries has similar features. At the same time, the level of provision by the state of this category of citizens varies from its absence, as in India, to the provision by the state to volunteers of all social guarantees and equalization of their status with military personnel, as in China and Russia.
About the Author
D. А. SemiannikovaRussian Federation
Dina A. Semiannikova, Associate Professor of the Department of Law, PhD in Jurisprudence
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Bevelikova N. M., Troshchinsky P. V. Development of the Legal Status of the Armed Forces of the People’s Republic of China // Journal of Russian Law [Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava]. 2015. No. 3. P. 15–30. (In Russ.) EDN: TNVMOF. DOI: 10.12737/7795
2. Ilyin V. A., Morev M. V. The Special Military Operation Reveals New Features of Civil Society // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast [Ekonomicheskie I sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz]. 2022. V. 15. No. 5. (In Russ.) EDN: IJGJHO. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.1
3. Ismagulov K. E., Akhmetov E. K. On the Effectiveness of the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On the Defense and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan” (Monitoring of Legislation) // Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan [Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva I pravovoi informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan]. 2021. No. 2 (65). P. 134–141. (In Russ.). EDN: SJRRWI. DOI: 10.52026/2788-5291_2021_65_2_134
4. Kerimov D. A. The Subject of Common Theory of State and Law // Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie [Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie]. 1976. No. 1. P. 7–16. (In Russ.) EDN: UDZQJV
5. Korchagin R. Improvement of the Lawmaking Process in the Military Social Sphere: A Conceptual Approach // Public Administration [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba]. 2010. No. 4 (66). P. 69–71. (In Russ.) EDN: MVYSSL
6. Mirkhaydarova M. Yu. Criminalization and Toughening of the Liability for Crimes against the Military Service, Peace and Security of the Humanity in the Conditions of the Special Military Operation // Russian Investigator [Rossiiskii sledovatel’’]. 2023. No. 8. P. 40–42. (In Russ.) EDN: ORRFLN. DOI: 10.18572/18123783-2023-8-40-42
7. Mikhailova E. V. Ways and Forms of Protecting the Rights of Citizens Conscripted for Military Service during Partial Mobilization // Russian Judge [Rossiiskii sud’ya]. 2023. No. 8. P. 7–11. (In Russ.) EDN: TIJUPH. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2023-8-7-11
8. Nekrasov D. V. Special Military Operation in Ukraine in the Context of the Theory of Just War // Social and Humanitarian Knowledge [Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya]. 2022. No. 5. P. 164–166. (In Russ.) EDN: QKQIWB. DOI: 10.34823/SGZ.2022.5.518899
9. Petrosyan T. Volunteerism in Armenia // Bulletin of the Omsk Orthodox Theological Seminary [Vestnik Omskoi Pravoslavnoi Dukhovnoi Seminarii]. 2019. No. 1 (6). P. 183–185. (In Russ.) EDN: NATCZO
10. Sailan B. S. Armed Forces of Independent Kazakhstan: Creation and Development // Military Institute of Land Forces Bulletin [Vestnik Voennogo institute Sukhoputnykh voisk]. 2022. No. 50. P. 9–17. (In Kazakh.) EDN: PPGNUL. DOI: 10.56132/2791-3368.2022.2-49-01
11. Sergeev N. M., Volkov G. Y. Republic of Belarus and Special Military Operation // Post-Soviet Continent [Postsovetskii materik]. 2023. No. 2 (38). P. 27–45. (In Russ.) EDN: LKZTUO. DOI: 10.48137/23116412_20 23_2_27
12. Topchiy I. A. Chinese Troops on the Territory of DPRK after the End of the Korean War (1953–1958) // Reports of the Laboratory of Ancient Technologies [Izvestiya Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologii]. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 1 (34). P. 245–256. (In Russ.) EDN: CNSMBK. DOI: 10.21285/2415-8739-2020-1-245-256
13. Kai Liao. The Future War Studies Community and the Chinese Revolution in Military Affairs // International Affairs. 2020. Vol. 96. No. 5. P. 1327–1346, DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiaa098
14. Kutnaeva N. Armed Forces and Military Reform in Kyrgyzstan // Central Asia and the Caucasus. 2007. No. 5 (47). P. 116–127. EDN: PWDLDF
15. Passos A. From Counterinsurgency to Law-and-Order Operations: An Analysis of Social Civic Actions Implemented by the Brazilian Army // Conflict, Security & Development. 2023. No. 23. P. 135–152. DOI: 1 0.1080/14678802.2023.2226610/
16. Thuso Benton Mongwaketse. The SANDF as a Human Security Instrument Post-1994 // The Strategic Review for Southern Africa. 2020. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 28–52. DOI: 10.35293/SRSA.V38I2.222
17. Villa R. D., Passos A. M. Engagement of Military Peacekeepers in Brazilian Politics (2011–2021) // Armed Forces & Society. 2022. Vol. 49. No. 3. P. 752–775. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X221087254
Review
For citations:
Semiannikova D.А. Some Peculiarities of Establishing the Legal Status of Military Volunteers in the EAEU and BRICS Member States. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2024;18(2):81-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-02-81-89. EDN: KKGEJB