Modern Concept of Aggression and Legal Principles for the Settlement of Regional Armed Conflicts

The legitimacy of states’ responses to acts of aggression in the context of modern international law is closely linked to the institution of humanitarian intervention and the right to self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. Aim. To formulate principles of legal interaction between states to overcome military tensions in the Eurasian region. Methods. A diachronic analysis of the institution of aggression in international law aims to develop norms of humanitarian law that are adequate to contemporary realities and that deter states from the unfounded and unjustified use of force. Results. The United Nations Security Council remains the primary legitimate element of the international legal mechanism for holding states and their military and political leadership accountable for aggression. Conclusions. Direct and indirect aggression differ significantly in the formal nature of the legitimization of unfriendly actions, but they utilize the same military and political means of waging war. The aspirations of neoliberal elites to form a new international legal order, where the International Criminal Court would have jurisdiction to prosecute political leaders for international crimes, are aimed at undermining the sovereign status of states and have not received widespread international recognition. Limiting a state’s sovereignty by recognizing the actions of its military and political leadership as an act of aggression requires consensus among the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, which typically occurs at the end of an armed conflict when confidence- and security-building measures are being developed.

1. Abashidze, A. Kh. The Changing of Contemporary International Law in the Context of Civilizational Confrontation // Bulletin of the Law Faculty of the Southern Federal University. 2022. Vol. 9, No. 4. P. 69– 74 (In Russ.). EDN: NURNJX. DOI: 10.18522/2313-6138-2022-9-4-9.

2. Alekseev, G. V., Kharina, O. N. Legal Regulation of States and International Journalistic Organizations Interaction in the Eurasian Media Space // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2025. Vol. 19, No. 1 (51). P. 118–129 (In Russ.). EDN: MNRVIW. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2025-01-118-129.

3. Bagandova, L. Z. Retroactive Application of Criminal Law in Relation to Crimes of Aggression: Historical and International Aspects // International Law and International Organizations. 2024. No. 4. P. 101–110 (In Russ.). EDN: WURIQE. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2024.4.7 2886.

4. Vershinin, A. A. Contradictions of Collective Security Model: Modern Historiography on the Evolution of the Versailles System of International Relations in the 1930s // MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2022. Vol. 15, No. 2. P. 108–140 (In Russ.). EDN: FDPIAY. DOI:10.24833/2071-8160-2022-2-83-108-140.

5. Global Extremism Index / ed. by A. I. Bastrykin, V. P. Kirilenko, A. D. Khlutkov, V. A. Shamakhov. St. Petersburg : Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 2023. 416 p. (In Russ.). EDN: JTDRWY.

6. Glotova, S. V. Crime of Aggression: Some Legal Issues of the Definition in the Nuremberg Statute and Rome Statute of International Criminal Court // Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 2 (106). P. 87–96 (In Russ.). EDN: ZMQBJB.

7. Dorskaya, A. A., Dorskii, A. Yu. The Contribution of Soviet Academic Science to the Development of the International Criminal Liability Institution in the 1930s and 1940s // Journal of Russian Law. 2024. Vol. 28, No. 5. P. 28–40 (In Russ.). EDN: LXRECK. DOI: 10.61205/S16056590003 0393-6.

8. Ilinskaya, O. I. The Formation of the Principle Prohibiting Wars of Aggression before the Establishment of the United Nations Organization // Lex Russica (Russian Law). 2017. No. 8 (129). P. 167–176 (In Russ.). EDN: ZFBVZR. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2017.129.8.167-176.

9. Kibalnik, A. G., Solomonenko, I. G. Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind. St. Petersburg, 2004. 385 p. (In Russ.). EDN: RXGVST.

10. Kirilenko, V. P., Alekseev, G. V. International Integration, Democracy and Information Security of the State // Administrative Consulting. 2017. No. 3 (99). P. 8–15 (In Russ.). EDN: YRLGCT.

11. Kirilenko, V. P., Korostelev, S. V. On the Right of States to Preemptive Use of Military Force // Military Thought. 2011. No. 9. P. 55–60 (In Russ.). EDN: OFFKMN.

12. Kirilenko, V. P., Shamakhov, V. A., Alekseev, G. V. Countering Extremist Ideology and Media Security of the State // Administrative Consulting. 2023. No. 11 (179). P. 9–24 (In Russ.). EDN: NLRVPZ. DOI: 10.22394/17261139-2023-11-9-24.

13. Prolegomenon of Cognitive Security. Monograph / ed. by I. F. Kefeli. St. Petersburg : ID Petropolis, 2023. 488 p. P. 423–461 (In Russ.). EDN: MRECBE.

14. Rarog, A. I. On Unexecutable and Impracticable Criminal Law Norms // Scientific Portal of the Russia Ministry of the Interior. 2022. No. 1 (57). P. 65–72 (In Russ.). EDN: KNMRIO.

15. Sayapin, S. V. The Definition of the Crime of Aggression and National Systems of Criminal Justice // International Justice. 2012. No. 1 (2). P. 87–97 (In Russ.). EDN: OZQLIF.

16. Smirnov, M. G. The Briand — Kellogg Pact and Its International Legal Significance // Matters of Russian and International Law. 2023. Vol. 13, No. 3–1. P. 583–590 (In Russ.). EDN: SADXUS. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2023.52.61.078.

17. Timoshkov, S. G. Aggression as an International Crime : Abstract of a PhD Dissertation. Moscow, 2017. 27 p. (In Russ.). EDN: QBRFF.

18. De Bock, Charles. The Crime of Aggression: Prospects and Perils for the Third World // Chinese Journal of International Law. 2014. Vol. 13, Iss. 1. P. 91–131. DOI: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmt042.

19. Hajdin, N. R. The Actus Reus of the Crime of Aggression // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 34 (2). P. 489–504. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156521000042.

20. Heller, K. J. Retreat from Nuremberg: The Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression // European Journal of International Law. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 477–497. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chm025.

21. Jia, Bing Bing. The Crime of Aggression as Custom and the Mechanisms for Determining Acts of Aggression // The American Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 109. P. 569–582. DOI: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0569.