Maritime Communications in the Spatial Organization of the Arctic Version of the “Great Game”
EDN: QNMCEA
Abstract
The article analyzes the role and importance of maritime communications in the spatial organization of the Arctic version of the “Great Game”, the main actors of which are Russia, China and the United States. The “Great Game” is also reaching a new level. If in the 19th century the parties to the confrontation were the great powers of the maritime and continental nature, having significant experience of imperial development, now the intercontinental (America — Eurasia) Arctic version of the “Great Game” is unfolding before our eyes along the meridian axis of the interface of the two hemispheres. The basis of this version is to achieve control over Arctic maritime communications in order to organize the most rational supply chains along the America — Asia line. Aim. Substantiation of Russia’s positioning in the contours of the strategic initiative “Let’s Make Russia Great Again” on the margins of the modern version of the “Great Game” in the new geopolitical conditions of the development of the MAGA (Make America Great Again) concept and the decline of the global ultra-liberal world order based on “rules”. Tasks. To determine the lines of probable intercontinental (America and Eurasia) confrontation on the Arctic sea communications along the meridian of the interface of the two hemispheres. To clarify and regulate the possibilities of coordinating military, political and economic activities in the Arctic. Methods. Strategic planning combined with the tools of spatial economics and the Western version of the latter, known as the theory of “new economic geography”. This makes it possible to substantiate the importance of maritime communications in the modern version of the “Great Game” and in the dynamics of the prospective development of the Russian Arctic. Conclusions. Against the background of the implementation of the MAGA concept in the western hemisphere, favorable conditions are being created in the fields of the modern (Arctic) version of the “Great Game” for the development of the strategic initiative “Let’s Make Russia Great Again” in the eastern hemisphere. This wi ll contribute to its guaranteed access to the North Atlantic from the Black Sea and Baltic directions, as well as strengthen its position in Northern Eurasia and the northern segment of the Indo-Pacific.
About the Author
S. Yu. KozmenkoRussian Federation
Sergey Yu. Kozmenko, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher, G. P. Luzin Institute of Economic Problems
Apatity
References
1. Ivashov, L. G. Geopolitics of Russian Civilization. Moscow : Institute of Russian Civilization, 2015. 800 p. (In Russ.) EDN: XDCIJT
2. Kefeli, I. F., Abylgaziev, I. I., Ilyin, I. V. [et al.] Global Geopolitics : monograph. 2nd ed. Moscow : Publishing house of Moscow State Universi ty. 2017. 280 p. ISBN: 978-5-19-011221-4. (In Russ.)
3. Kefeli, I. F., Malafeev, O. A. Mathematical Principles of Global Geopolitics. St. Petersburg : Publishing house of the Polytechnic University, 2013. 204 p. ISBN: 978-5-7422-4098-3. (In Russ.) EDN: SJHSFH
4. Kozmenko, S. Yu. Maritime and Continental Contours of the Geopolitical Status of Modern Russia // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2025. Vol. 19, No. 2 (52). P. 23–32. (In Russ.) EDN: SCQHHQ
5. Kozmenko, S. Yu., Kozmenko, A. S. New Conditions for the Development of the “Great Game” in the Arctic and Priorities of the Current Concept of Russia’s Foreign Policy // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2023. Vol. 17, No. 4 (46). P. 52–61. (In Russ.) EDN: MXZXOB. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-52-61
6. Kozmenko, S. Yu., Kozmenko, A. S. Planning the Development of Arctic Maritime Communications in the Era of Hybrid Warfare // Arctic and North. 2025. No. 59. P. 44–62. (In Russ.) EDN: TAAHMS. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2025.59.44
7. Kozmenko, S. Yu., Kozmenko, A. S. Planning Russia’s Economic Presence in the Arctic // North and Market: Formation of Economic Order. 2024. Vol. 27, No. 2 (84). P. 146–157. (In Russ.) EDN: YPLFCB. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.2.2024.84.011
8. Colomb, F. Naval Warfare, Its Basic Principles and Experience / transl. by N. P. Azbelev. Moscow, St. Petersburg : Terra Fantastica. 2003. 668 p. ISBN: 5-17-016752-0. (In Russ.)
9. Mahan, A. T. The Influence of Naval Power on the French Revolution and the Empire / transl. by N. L. Klado, in 2 vol. Moscow, St. Petersburg : Terra Fantastica. 2002. (In Russ.)
10. Strelnikova, I. A., Mayorov, M. G., Popov, D. I. BRICS Expansion: Implications for Logistics Cooperation in the Arctic // Analysis and Forecasting. 2024. No. 3, P. 71–82. (In Russ.) EDN: FGFWBI. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2024-3-71-82
11. Mackinder, H. J. Democratic Ideals and Reality. New York : Henry Holt and Co., 1942. (First published in 1919). National Defense University Press Publications, Washington, DC, 1996. 213 p.
12. Mackinder, H. J. The Geographical Pivot of History // The Geographical Journal. 1904. Vol. 23, No. 4 (Apr., 1904). P. 298–321. DOI: 10.2307/1775498
13. Mackinder, H. J. The Round World and the Winning of Peace // Foreign Affairs. Vol. 21, No. 4 (Jul., 1943). P. 595–605. DOI: 10.2307/20029780
14. Mahan, A. T. The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660–1783. Boston : Little, Brown, and Company. 1890 / transl. by N. P. Azbelev. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica, 2002. 636 p.
Review
For citations:
Kozmenko S.Yu. Maritime Communications in the Spatial Organization of the Arctic Version of the “Great Game”. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2026;20(2):58-67. (In Russ.) EDN: QNMCEA
JATS XML




























