Preview

EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics

Advanced search

AI-technologies as a Basis for Ensuring Technological Sovereignty: Challenges and Threats for the EAEU Countries

EDN: QNBZDU

Abstract

The article devotes to the problem of ensuring technological sovereignty. Aim and tasks. Identify the key methods that allow the United States to preserve their technological dominance and determine the trajectory for creating an AI ecosystem that is independent of Western technologies. Methods. The author used the following research methods: critical discourse analysis, content analysis, and system analysis. Results. Despite the fact that Chinese high-tech companies are successfully competing with American IT-corporations, the United States continue to firmly hold the global technological leadership, which gives them the opportunity not only to decide with which countries and under what conditions to share their technologies, but also to control global information flows. This author sees a particular danger in the proliferation of large language models that have been developed by leading American IT-corporations. These models, while being trained on Western texts, become an extremely convenient tool for exporting Western values to countries with a completely different cultural and civilizational code, which only exacerbates the ideological and cultural hegemony of the countries of the collective West. The article shows that both Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan have developed their own large language models, but they are based on the American the most popular model called LLaMA1. In Russia, after the beginning of a special military operation and the withdrawal of many leading Western IT-companies from the Russian market, domestic developers were forced to offer their own technological solutions. However, the gap from Western AI-developers is about a year. Conclusion. Russian research and development in the field of advanced information technologies are still fragmental in nature, due to the high costs of training of AI-models from the very beginning. In this regard, the author suggests considering the possibility of joining the efforts of high-tech companies of the EAEU member-states in order to develop end-to-end AI-technologies that would be able to meet the most urgent demands of all partner countries and encourage the further strengthening of Eurasian integration.

About the Author

K. A. Pantserev
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Konstantin A. Pantserev, Doctor of Science (Political Sciences), Associate Professor 

Saint Petersburg 



References

1. Выходец, Р. С. Политика стран ЕАЭС в области искусственного интеллекта // Евразийская интеграция: экономика, право, политика. 2022. Т. 16, № 3. С. 106–117. [Vykhodets, R. S. The EAEU’s AI Strategy // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2022. Vol. 16, No. 3. P. 106–117. (In Russ.)]. EDN: SIZGKC. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2022-03-106-117

2. Гринин, Л. Е., Гринин, А. Л., Гринин, И. Л. Искусственный интеллект: развитие и тревоги. Взгляд в будущее. Статья вторая. Искусственный интеллект: терра инкогнита или управляемая сила? // Философия и общество. 2023. № 4. Р. 5–32. [Grinin, L. E., Grinin, A. L., Grinin, I. L. Artificial Intelligence: Development and Concerns. A Look into the Future. Article two. Artificial Intelligence: Terra Incognita or a Controlled Force? // Philosophy and Society. 2023. No. 4. P. 5–32. (In Russ.)] EDN: RVZOFX. DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2023.04.01

3. Кефели, И. Ф. Асфатроника: на пути к теории глобальной безопасности. СПб. : ИПЦ СЗИУ РАНХиГС, 2020. [Kefeli, I. F. Asphatronics: Towards a Theory of Global Security. Saint Petersbrg: RANEPA, 2020. (In Russ.)] EDN: XPJYCG

4. Кушнир, А. М., Кушнир, А. А. Критический анализ концепции четвертой промышленной революции Клауса Шваба // Социально-политические науки. 2023. № 4. С. 106–124. [Kushnir, A. M., Kushnir, A. A. A Critical Analysis of Klaus Schwab’s Concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Sociopolitical Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 105–124. (In Russ.)] EDN: NVUTSY. DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-105-124

5. Adams, R. Can Artificial Intelligence Be Decolonized? // Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2021. No. 46 (1– 2). P. 176–197. EDN: QEVAEN. DOI: 10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225

6. Barett, T., Okolo, C. T., Biira, B. [et al.] African Data Ethics: A Discursive Framework for Black Decolonial Data Science [Electronic resource] // arXiv. 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16043 (accessed: 07.05.2026). DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.16043

7. Birhane, A. Algorithmic Colonization of Africa // SCRIPTed. 2020. Vol. 17, № 2. P. 389–409. EDN: XOPGXK. DOI: 10.2966/scrip.170220.389

8. Blodgett, S. L., Barocas, S., Daum´e, H. III, Wallach, H. Language (technology) is Power: A Critical Aurvey of “Bias” in NLP // Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics / ed. by D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, J. Tetreault. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. P. 5454–5476. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485

9. Grinin, L. E., Grinin, A. L., Grinin, I. L. The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence: From Assistance to Super Mind of Artificial General Intelligence? Article 1. Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence: The Past, Present and Some Forecasts // Social Evolution & History. 2024. No. 23 (1), March. Р. 156–183. EDN: DCJXLN. DOI: 10.30884/seh/2024.01.07

10. Grinin, L., Grinin, A., Korotayev, A. Cybernetic Revolution and Global Aging: Humankind on the Way to Cybernetic Society, or the Next Hundred Years. Springer, 2024. EDN: ALKTTA. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-56764-3

11. Kang, D.-Y., Duong, H., Park, J.-C. Application of Deep Learning in Dentistry and Implantology // The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology. 2020. No. 24 (3). Р. 148–181. EDN: UIVPPR. DOI: 10.32542/implantology.202015

12. Redvers, N., Bird, M. Y., Quinn, D [et al.] Molecular Decolonization: An Indigenous Microcosm Perspective of Planetary Health // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. Vol. 17, No. 12. Р. 1–13. EDN: VYBDGN. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124586

13. Valiani, A. A. Frontiers of Bio-decolonization: Indigenous Data Sovereignty as a Possible Model for Community-based Participatory Genomic Health Research for Racialized Peoples in Postgenomic Canada // Genealogy. 2022. Vol. 6, № 3. Р. 1–17. EDN: ATFBLBю DOI: 10.3390/genealogy6030068

14. Vaswani, А., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N. [et al.] Attention Is All You Need [Electronic resource] // arXiv. 2017. URL: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aaPaper.pdf (accessed: 09.05.2026). DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

15. Yan, N., Xu, C. Decolonizing African NLP: A Survey on Power Dynamics and Data Colonialism in Tech Development [Electronic resource] // AfricaNLP workshop at ICLR 2024. URL: https://openreview.net/pdf?id=D698BEfwgv (accessed: 07.05.2026).

16. Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J. [et al.] A Survey of Large Language Models [Electronic resource] // arXiv. 2023, November 24. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.18223 (accessed: 09.05.2026).


Review

For citations:


Pantserev K.A. AI-technologies as a Basis for Ensuring Technological Sovereignty: Challenges and Threats for the EAEU Countries. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2026;20(2):134-145. (In Russ.) EDN: QNBZDU

Views: 55

JATS XML

ISSN 2073-2929 (Print)