The Use of Environmental Mythologies In Order To Legitimize the Globalization

The purpose of this work is to consider the features of the use of environmental mythology, to give scientific validity to the plans of the organizers of the “new world order”. The basic principles and stages of reforming the world community according to the plans of globalization, in order to eliminate its structural structure as a set of States. The necessity of masking the true goals of globalists is noted. The features of nature use in the modern Western society and their connection with the modern global ecological crisis are considered. The fundamental principles of environmental management of the market economy are considered: natural resources are “inexhaustible” and “do not have their own value”. The myth of “global warming” is considered. A critical assessment of the versions of warming and cooling of the earth’s climate is given. The analysis of the reasons for the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the surface layer of the atmosphere. The statement about the forthcoming rise in the level of the world ocean due to the release of carbon dioxide by anthropogenic sources is considered. Abstract analysis of the scientific discussion is made: how do the phenomena of increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide over the past decades and the increase in the temperature of the surface of the atmosphere at the same time relate to each other. The reasons why the pseudoscientific myth of “global warming” is persistently promoted by supporters of globalism through mass media are analyzed. The following conclusions are made. Climate warming is a consequence of natural cyclic fluctuations in the temperature of the atmosphere of our planet. Since the cause of warming is not man-made, this process can not be regulated by man. The increase in the amount of carbon dioxide is due to the increase in the temperature of the planet due to the impact of changing space factors, which in the history of the Earth periodically change, leading to glacial and interglacial periods. The anthropogenic nature of climate warming is not true, but this version is used by supporters of globalism for political purposes, as it allows to build a myth about the guilt of countries that own resources in activating the “greenhouse effect”. And if so, say the supporters of the “new world order”, the world can be saved only through the forcible deprivation of the sovereignty of States on natural resources.

1. Павленко В.В. Глобализация экологии как инструмент подрыва стабильности и управления конфликтами [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/globalizatciya_ekologii/ (дата обращения: 14.07.2018).

2. Кара-Мурза С.Г. Научная картина мира и фактор природы в экономике [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://portalus.ru/modules/philosophy/rus_readme.php?archive=0213&id=1108806365&start_from=&subaction=showfull&ucat=1 (дата обращения: 05.05.2015)

3. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч.: 2-е изд. Т. 1–50. М., 1955–1981.

4. Stanley Jevons W. The Coal Question. М. : Книга по требованию, 2012.

5. Пономаренко В. Проблема 2033 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://rusidiot.boom.ru/publics/pr2033.html (дата обращения: 14.07.2018).

6. Подолинский С.А. Труд человека и его отношение к распределению энергии. СПб. : Слово, 1880; М. : Ноосфера, 1991.

7. Как спасти человечество от экологических катастроф. Империалистическая глобализация и ноосферный социализм: экологическая гибель или спасение человечества [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://accastering.tumblr.com/post/81378392232/ (дата обращения: 14.07.2018).

8. Кара-Мурза С.Г. Манипуляция сознанием [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://bookscafe.net/read/kara_murza_sergey-manipulyaciya_soznaniem-257494.html#p1 (дата обращения: 14.07.2018).