Interview with Tatyana Valovaya

Interview with Andrei Denisov

The article analyses the main problems and prospects of pairing two global projects, expanding on the Eurasian space — Eurasian Economic Union and “One belt — one way”. These projects involved many States, faced with acute problems of choice of economic partners, allies, a combination of their own national interests in the large scale of a Great Eurasian partnership (“Great Eurasia”).

Purpose of the article is the analyze of financial support of small and medium businesses, which is implemented in all states of Eurasian Economic Union. Author researched the role of crediting and insurance, which have a big potential to here. In this researching was used official statistical information, informative and structural analysis, which allow to ensure to logicality and consistency for that work. In result author detected regularities and problems, which have all states of Eurasian Economic Union in common. This is evidence a financial support, which small and medium businesses get every year, is not enough sufficient and stable. This leads to objective constriction production and economic activity of self-employed and stagnation of this economic sector of Eurasian Economic Union.

The article is based on the research of Igor Iv. Lukashuk “Foreign policy of Russiaand international law” devoted to the development of Russian Federation’s foreign policy. This article includes the analysis of Lukashuk’s work, his mains ideas on the direction of Russia’s foreign policy and on the establishment of a new world order, on the growing importance of international law and on the formal enshrinement of international law in the legal system of Russian Federation.
This article is concentrated on the relevance and significance of Lukashuk’s ideas today when we have a chance to assess the validity of his projects. It also stresses the importance of his research for the future specialists in the field of international relations.

The purpose given works is improvement of legal administration of migration processes on space of the CSTO in modern conditions. On the basis of scientific methods of knowledge, the author analyzes the current state of the studied perspective, topical issues of legal regulation of migration processes as in global world scale, and applicable the territory which is under jurisdiction of the CSTO are studied. The author the reasons reveal and conditions of emergence of undesirable migrations when under the guise of refugees fighters get on the adjacent territory for commission of acts of terrorism come to light. Summarizing the author it is advisable to initiate consideration of a question of legislative restriction of undesirable migrations not only in theRussian Federation, but also in the CSTO State Parties as borders “are absolutely transparent” here.

This article defines the essence of the hybrid warfare phenomenon and studies the main manifestations of this type of war in relation to the post-Soviet States of Central Asia. Comparative and phenomenological research methods are used. The article considers the main technologies of hybrid warfare in the geographical, economic, information-ideological and information-cybernetic spaces of the Central Asian States, as well as well as the ways to confront these technologies. Conclusion: the inclusion of the State ideology in the scope of constitutional rights should be a political decision of the Member States of the CSTO is a response to the challenge posed by space wars hybrid Big Eurasia. To be here and the great work of the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly. Recognition of State ideology not only as the basis for State and public security, but also the spiritual life space devices of the Eurasian Union should become a response to the challenges of hybrid war.

In the article some aspects of creating a joint and united air and missile defense system of the Collective Security Treaty Organization are discussed. Certain obstacles to its creation are analyzed. Some concerns ofArmeniain the light of modern threats to its national security and collective security of the Treaty member states are formulated.

Colleagues and parliamentarians need to think about the concentration of efforts in solving problems and conflicts that exist in the areas of interest and responsibility of integration associations. This is one of the conclusions of this article, in which, using historical material, the author considers the parliamentary diplomacy of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the signing of the Bishkek Protocol.

This year marks the twenty-five years since the signing of the Bishkek Protocol (1994), which played a significant role in resolving the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh and became a significant contribution of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent States in peacekeeping activities during the post-soviet period. The article is dedicated to this event. The author in 1994 was an Assistant Deputy Secretary General of the IPA CIS Council — Representative of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in the IPA CIS, recalls the atmosphere of those days and the negotiations related to the preparation and signing of the document.
The events connected with the preparation of signing certainly allow us to look at some aspects of the development of parliamentary diplomacy, which is important, both for the development of diplomacy and parliamentarism in general.