The other Space Treaty: Problems of Interpretation of the Concepts of “Exploration” and “Use” in the Context of the Commercialization of Space Resources

Aim. Тhe purpose of the study is to conduct a detailed legal analysis of the content of the concepts of “exploration” and “use” of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, as set out in the 1967 Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space (hereinafter referred to as the Outer Space Treaty), to identify the exact legal meaning of these terms in the context of objectives and principles of the Outer Space Treaty, as well as an assessment of the impact of the content of these definitions on the formation of a legal regime for the commercial use of space resources. Methods. The research is based on the application of a set of general scientific and special methods: analysis, synthesis, historical, logical, formal-legal and comparative-legal. The article analyzes international legal acts, national legislation, as well as the activities of international organizations. Results. Thus, it is revealed that the concept of “research” is traditionally interpreted as a study, and “use” as a practical application of space, however, the boundaries of “use” are blurred. The results show that the lack of a clear definition of the concept of “use” in the Outer Space Treaty creates legal uncertainty, especially in matters of commercial activities and the exploitation of space resources. Conclusions. As a result, it is concluded that it is necessary to include in the concept of “use” such types of activities as exploitation, extraction, development and specify their content. Otherwise, there will be a risk of conflicts and inefficiency of the legal regime in the context of rapid technological progress and commercialization of space. It also requires the development of an internationally agreed approach to the interpretation of Article 2 of the Outer Space Treaty, primarily within the framework of the UN Committee on Outer Space, as well as the establishment of criteria to distinguish temporary use from activities that create sustainable control over outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies. At the same time, it is important to strengthen the principles of transparency and cooperation between States in order to minimize the risk of exploitation escalating into appropriation.

1. Volynskaya, O. A. Anniversary of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty // Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 4. P. 82–95. (In Russ.) EDN: YUELEJ. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2017-4-82-95

2. Vylegzhanin, A. N., Yuzbashyan, M. R., Alekseev, M. A. International Legal Prospects for Using Natural Resources of the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies // Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin. 2021. No. 3-1. P. 155–172. (In Russ.) EDN: TSCHMM. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_31_0_155

3. Yelizarov, M. V. International Legal Framework for the Peaceful Exploration of Outer Space: Problematic Aspects // The Rule of Law State: Theory and Practice. 2021. No. 3 (65). P. 225–232. (In Russ.) EDN: JNIFES. DOI: 10.33184/pravgos-2021.3.18

4. Krylov, N. B., Shinkaretskaya, G. G. Intertemporal Interpretation of the Outer Space Treaty and non-State Actors // State and Law. 2021. No. 3. P. 112–121. (In Russ.) EDN: WLVGQC. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014151-7

5. Shiyko, Ts. The UN Outer Space Treaty of 1967 in the Light of the Development of Space Activities of States : Dissertation ... Candidate of Law : 12.00.10. Moscow, 1999. 178 p. (In Russ.) EDN: NLOKND

6. Shtodina, I. Yu. Does the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, Have a Future? // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2023. Vol. 19, No. 6. P. 96–102. (In Russ.) EDN: OXCICH. DOI: 10.61205/jzsp.2023.085

7. Dembling, P. G., Arons, D. M. The Evolution of the Outer Space Treaty // Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 1967. Vol. 33. Р. 419–456. URL: https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188046313.pdf (acce ssed: 20.01.2026).

8. Chang, B. Properly Speaking, Only Celestial Bodies Have Been Reserved for Use Exclusively for Peaceful (Non-Military) Purposes, but Not Outer Void Space // International Law Students. 2000. Vol. 75. Р. 81– 117. URL: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1434&context=ils (accessed: 20.01.2026).

9. Cologne Commentary on Space Law. Outer Space Treaty / ed. by Stephan Hobe, LL. M. Köln : Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH, 2009. 757 р. ISBN: 978-3-8305-3771-7.

10. Gorove, S. Freedom of Exploration and Use in the Outer Space Treaty: A Textual Analysis and Interpretation // Denver Journal of International Law & Policy. 1971. No. 93. P. 93–107. URL: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2191&context=djilp (accessed: 20.01.2026).

11. Gorove, S. Interpreting Article II of Other Space Treaty // Fordham Law Revive. 1969. Vol. 37. P. 349–354. URL: https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/144223053.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2026).

12. Keefe, H. Making the Final Frontier Feasible: A Critical Look at the Current Body of Outer Space Law // Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal. 2012. No. 11. Р. 345–371. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/chtlj/vol11/iss2/7/ (accessed: 20.01.2026).

13. Steele, S. M . International Space Law: A Hindrance to Space Activities or a Resolute Action for Change // American Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2022. Vol. 9, No. 1. Р. 1–13. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11

14. Solomou, А. The Development of International Law Regarding the Peaceful Uses of Other Space // 5 Gray’s Inn Student Law Journal. 2013. Р. 10–37.

15. Vedda, J. A. The Outer Space Treaty: Assessing Its Relevance at the 50-Year Mark // Center for Space Policy and Strategy Policy Paper June. 2017. Р. 1–7. URL: https://csps.aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/ OuterSpaceTreaty.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2026).