About the Effect of the EAEU Court’s Advisory Opinion Dated March 28, 2024 in the Law Practice of the EAEU Member States

Aim. The purpose of the research is to explain the reasons of the ambiguity of the Russian courts’ perception of the Advisory Opinion of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union dated March 28, 2024. The author describes in details the factual circumstances of the case, the legal grounds for issuing the said advisory opinion and its content, and attempts to determine the legal nature and actual legal force of this judicial act. Methods. The research methodology is based on both general scientific methods: analysis, synthesis, historical and systematic, as well as private scientific methods: formal legal and comparative legal. These methods were used when working with sources of law and law enforcement acts of the Eurasian Economic Union, its member states, domestic and foreign doctrine. Results. Advisory Opinion of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union dated March 28, 2024 was adopted in compliance with subject and material jurisdiction contains an official interpretation of the law of the Eurasian Economic Union and aims to ensure their uniform application, is able to help in resolution of concrete dispute. This advisory opinion was not taken into account by the national courts because of its formally recommendatory character. Conclusions. The legal nature of the advisory opinions of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union does not coincide with the legal nature of decisions on prejudicial requests due to a number of procedural, subjective and formal reasons. The legal positions from the Advisory Opinion of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union dated March 28, 2024 at the time of the proceedings in the Russian courts acted as usage, the execution of which was voluntary. They have not been transformed into international legal customs due to the lack of recognition by States of their binding nature.

1. Ispolinov, A. S. Advisory Jurisdiction of International Courts: Some Lessons for the EAEU Court // New Challenges of EAEU Integration: Legal Dimension : collection of Materials from the International Conference (Minsk, November 25–27, 2020) Minsk : Kolorgrad, 2021. P. 179–182. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46353491_94830605.pdf (In Russ.)

2. Ispolinov, A. S. Courts of Regional Integration Associations in the International Justice System (On the Example of the Court of the EU and the Court of the EAEU). Moscow : Justicinform, 2018. 312 p. ISBN: 978-5-7205-1472-3. (In Russ.)

3. Karlyuk, M. V. Mechanism for Ensuring Uniform Application and Interpretation of Law within the Framework of European and Eurasian Integration // International Justice and Strengthening Integration Processes. Mat. International Conference (Minsk, October 18–19, 2018). Minsk : Four Quarters, 2019. P. 220–231. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/308137037.pdf (In Russ.)

4. Lukashuk, I. I. Sources of International Law. Kiev, 1966. 127 p. (In Russ.)

5. Myslivskiy, P. P. Execution of Acts of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: Review of the First Problems and Ways for Their Solution // HSE Journal of International Law. 2023. No. 2. P. 42–53. (In Russ.) EDN: JYJQYU. DOI: 10.17323/jil.2023.18188

6. Myslivskiy, P. P. Execution of Judgments and Advisory Opinions of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union // Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 3. P. 78–97. (In Russ.) EDN: MOKDOI. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2021-3-78-97

7. Neshataeva, T. N. Hearing Life: The Effect of Acts of an International Court in National Legal Systems // International Justice. 2018. No. 1. P. 53–66. (In Russ.) EDN: QOMYPN. DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2018-1-53-66

8. Neshataeva, T. N. Court and Law: Eurasian Integration. Moscow : Norma : INFRA-M, 2024. 336 p. ISBN: 978-5-00156-141-5. (In Russ.)

9. Seitimova, V. H. The Role of Advisory Opinions of the EAEU Court in the Development of Union Law and Eurasian Integration // International Relations and Society. 2019. No. 3. P. 75–82. (In Russ.) EDN: WYGRZK

10. Skripkina, G. A. The Practice of the EAEU Court as a Factor in Improving the Law of the Union // International Justice and Strengthening Integration Processes. Mat. International Conference (Minsk, October 18–19, 2018). Minsk : Four Quarters, 2019. P. 156–162. (In Russ.)

11. Smbatyan, A. S. Decisions of International Justice Bodies in the System of International Public Law. Moscow : Statute, 2012. 270 p. ISBN: 978-5-8354-0872-6. (In Russ.)

12. Tolstykh, V. L. The Advisory Function of the International Courts of Justice // Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Law. 2011. No. 1. P. 149–157. (In Russ.) EDN: NWZVDF

13. Khalafyan, R. M. Advisory Opinions of the Eurasian Economic Court in the Mechanism of Regional Integration Legal Enforcement // Modern Law. 2020. No. 8. P. 122–128. (In Russ.) EDN: LWLNXU. DOI: 10.25799/NI.2020.63.33.012

14. Chernyak, L. Y. Question of the Relationship Definitions “Custom” and “Usage” in the Theory of International Law // Siberian Law Herald. 2014. No. 4. P. 139–146. (In Russ.) EDN: TEDPAD

15. Oppenheim, L. International Law, a Treatise. Vol. 1–2. Lond., N. Y. : Longmans, Green, and co., 1905. 595 p.