Adaptation of Competitive Cooperative Strategy Based on Blockchain Technology to Improve the Efficiency of Governability
Abstract
The article considers the possibility of applying a competitive cooperative strategy (coopetition) to improve the effi ciency of governability. The coopetition strategy in this case is considered to be based on the blockchain technology. To achieve this goal, various approaches to governability, the coopetition strategy, as well as the applicability of the blockchain technology as a basis for the practical implementation of this strategy are analyzed. A new institutionalism is used as a methodology, and game theory methods are used. In this paper, an analysis of competitive and cooperative strategy and technology of blockchain was carried out in order to identify their applicability to improve the effi ciency of governability. As a result, factors have been identifi ed that prove the positive impact of the competitive-cooperative strategy based on the blockchain on the effectiveness of governability, as well as factors at this stage of the study that do not guarantee the full applicability of the above strategy in solving the tasks of political governance.
About the Author
Kirill A. Neverov
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill A. Neverov, Assistant Professor of the Department of Political Governance
Candidate of Political Science
References
1. Белоус А. Б. Управляемость как одна из основ экономической науки и практики управления // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета имени А. И. Герцена: Общественные и гуманитарные науки (экономика, право, социология): научный журнал. 2007. № 9. С. 85–96.
2. Пригожин А. И. Управленческие идеи: Вы какое положение на рынке хотите занять? Как должна измениться Ваша организация? М. : ЛЕНАНД, 2015.
3. Рубцова М. В. Управляемость как основополагающая социолого-управленческая категория // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2009. № 320. С. 53–58.
4. Belderbos R., Carree M., Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance // Research Policy. 2004. Vol. 33. No. 0. P. 1477–1492.
5. Bengtsson M., Raza-Ullah T., Vanyushyn V. The Coopetition Paradox and Tension: The Moderating Role of Coopetition Capability // Industrial Marketing Management. 2016. Vol. 53. P. 19–30.
6. Bouncken R. B., Gast J., Kraus S., Bogers M. Coopetition: A Systematic Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Directions // Review of Managerial Science. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 577–601.
7. Chiambaretto P., Dumez H. Toward a Typology of Coopetition: A Multilevel Approach // International Studies of Management and Organization. 2016. Vol. 46. No. 2–3. P. 110–129.
8. Christidis K., Devetsikiotis M. Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things // IEEE Access. 2016. Vol. 4. P. 2292–2303.
9. Dawes S. S. Governance in the Digital Age: A Research and Action Framework for an Uncertain Future // Government Information Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 257–264.
10. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., Tinkler J. New Public Management is Dead — Long Live Digital-Era Governance // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 467–494.
11. Estrada I., Faems D., de Faria P. Coopetition and Product Innovation Performance: The Role of Internal Knowledge Sharing Mechanisms and Formal Knowledge Protection Mechanisms // Industrial Marketing Management. 2016. Vol. 53. P. 56–65.
12. Evans D., Yen D. C. E-government: Evolving Relationship of Citizens and Government, Domestic, and International Development // Government Information Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 207–235.
13. Gast J., Filser M., Gundolf K., Kraus S. Coopetition Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Past Trends and Future Directions // International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 2015. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 492–521.
14. Goetz K. H. Governance as a Path to Government // West European Politics. 2008. Vol. 31. No. 1–2. P. 258–279.
15. Ibáñez L.-D., Simperl E., Gandon F., Story H. Redecentralizing the Web with Distributed Ledgers // IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2017. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 92–95.
16. Jentoft S. Limits of Governability: Institutional Implications for Fisheries and Coastal Governance // Marine Policy. 2007. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 360–370.
17. Luu L., Chu D.-H., Olickel H., Saxena P., Hobor A. Making Smart Contracts Smarter // Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2016. Vol. 24. P. 254–269.
18. Marsal-Llacuna M. Future Living Framework: Is Blockchain the Next Enabling Network? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 128. P. 226–234.
19. Ølnes S., Ubacht J., Janssen M. Blockchain in Government: Benefi ts and Implications of Distributed Ledger Technology for Information Sharing // Government Information Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 34. No. 3. P. 355–364.
20. Rhodes R. A. W. The New Governance: Governing without Government // Political Studies. 1996. Vol. 44. No. 4. P. 652–667.
21. Ritala P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. What’s in it for Me? Creating and Appropriating Value in Innovation-Related Coopetition // Technovation. 2009. Vol. 29. No. 12. P. 819–828.
22. Saxena K. B. C. Towards Excellence in E-governance // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005. Vol. 18. No. 6. P. 498–513.
23. Szabo N. The Idea of Smart Contracts [Электронный ресурс] // Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam. Nick Szabo's Papers and Concise Tutorials. URL: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/InformationInSpeech/CDROM/ Literature/LOTwinterschool2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/idea.html (дата обращения: 19.05.2019).
24. Van Kersbergen K., Van Waarden F. ‘Governance’ as a Bridge between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy // European Journal of Political Research. 2004. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 143–171.
25. Zyskind G., Nathan O., Pentland A. S. Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data // Proceedings — 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, SPW 2015. 2015. P. 180–184.
Review
For citations:
Neverov K.A. Adaptation of Competitive Cooperative Strategy Based on Blockchain Technology to Improve the Efficiency of Governability. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2019;(2):33-40. (In Russ.)
Views:
653
Email this article 
