Greater Eurasia Project in the Context of Interdisciplinary Discourse
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2020-4-88-102
Abstract
The article defines the basic methodological principles of the project “greater Eurasia”, involving the solution of the complex problems of the promotion of global security and sustainable world order in the “era of geopolitical tension” associated with the onset of “Globalization 2.0” at the initial stage of the sixth technological order, a revolutionary transition from “analog” to “digital era” at the beginning of the XXI century and the rethinking of anthropological values caused by the inclusion of the everyday life of modern human artificial intelligence — in the guise of an assistant, a controller of human behavior and actions, or a Chapek robot.
About the Authors
I. F. Kefeli
North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor F. Kefeli, Professor, Director of the Center for Geopolitical Expertise, Doctor of Science (Philosophy)
Saint Petersburg
M. O. Kolbanev
St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Michael O. Kolbanev, Professor, Doctor of Technical Science
Saint Petersburg
O. A. Malafeev
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Malafeev, Head of the Department of Modeling of Socio-Economic Systems, Doctor of Science (Physics and Mathematics), Professor
Saint Petersburg
O. V. Plebanek
University under the EurAsEC IPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Plebanek, Head of the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Associate Professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Anokhin P. K. Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional’noi sistemy. M. : Nauka, 1978. 400 s. S. 84.
2. Barabanov O. N., Bordachev T. V., Lisovolik Ya. D. [i dr.] Ne odichat’ v «osypayushchemsya mire». Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba «Valdai», mai 2020; ru.valdaiclub.com, 24 s. S. 16–17.
3. Vernadskii G. V. Nachertanie russkoi istorii. SPb. : Lan’, 2000. S. 30–33, 310.
4. Kapto A. S. Filosofiya mira: istoki, tendentsii, perspektivy. M. : Politizdat, 1990. 431 c.
5. Kefeli I. F. Asfatronika: na puti k teorii global’noi bezopasnosti : monografiya. SPb. : IPTs SZIU RANKhiGS, 2020. 228 s.
6. Kefeli I. F., Kuznetsov D. I. Evraziiskii vektor global’noi geopolitiki. Gl. V. M. : Yurait, 2020. 274 s.
7. Kefeli I. F., Malafeev O. A. Matematicheskie nachala global’noi geopolitiki. SPb. : Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2013. 204 s.
8. Maier-Shenberger V., Kuk’er K. Bol’shie dannye. Revolyutsiya, kotoraya izmenit to, kak my zhivem, rabotaem i myslim. M. : OOO «Mann, Ivanov i Ferber», 2014. 242 s. S. 22–23, 25.
9. Plebanek O. V. My nash, my novyi mir postroim! A chto takoe «mir»? (o kontseptualizatsii ponyatiya) // Globalizatsiya: na grani real’nogo i virtual’nogo. Koll. monogr. / otv. red. N. A. Baranov, SPb. : OOO «Geopolitika i bezopasnost’», ID «Petropolis», 2020. 292 s. S. 57.
10. Tishchenko P. D. Genomika: novyi tip nauki v novoi kul’turnoi situatsii // Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal «Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie». 2008. № 7.
11. Ackoff R. L. Ackoff’s Best. New York : John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 170–172.
12. Ackoff R. L. From Data to Wisdom, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16, 1989. Pp. 3–9.
13. Baum S. D. [et al.] Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization / S. D. Baum, S. Armstrong, T. Ekenstedt [et al.] // Foresight. 2019. V. 21 (1). Pp. 53–83 [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://gcrinstitute.org/papers/trajectories.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2020).
14. David Reinsel, John Gantz, John Rydning. Data age — 2025. The Digitization of the World from Edge to Core. IDC White Paper, November 2018. 28 p.
15. Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Peace Index 2020: Measuring Peace in a Complex World [Elektronnyi resurs], Sydney, June 2020. URL: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2020). Pp. 8–9, 54.
16. Kitchin R. Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London, UK : Sage, 2014. Pp. 31–40.
17. Shelling T. C. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Massachussets : Harvard University Press, 1993. Tsit. po: Shelling T. Strategiya konflikta. M. : IRISEN, 2007. S. 109–110.
18. Weinberger D. Everyday Chaos: Technology, Complexity, and How We’re Thriving in a New World of Possibility. Harvard Business Review Press, 2019.
19. Yong Ch. Singapore not Joining US, Japan-led Free and Open Indo-Pacific for Now: Vivian Balakrishnan. The Strait Times. 14.05.2018.
Review
For citations:
Kefeli I.F., Kolbanev M.O., Malafeev O.A., Plebanek O.V. Greater Eurasia Project in the Context of Interdisciplinary Discourse. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2020;14(4):88-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2020-4-88-102
Views:
485
Email this article 
