Foundations of Modern Eurasianism in Russian Political Discourse
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2020-4-120-128
Abstract
The growing integration processes in the Eurasian space confirm the geopolitical place and role of this region in modern international relations. Thus it becomes more important to understand the basic postulates of the Eurasianism concept for the development of national and geopolitical interests of Russia, as well as to study the process of evolution of the main provisions of classical Eurasianism in the foundations of modern Russian neo-Eurasianism, as well as to determine the main stages of this process.
The work is based on the analysis of publications of Russian neo-Eurasianism representatives, scientific works of foreign and domestic researchers of this phenomenon in the Russian political discourse.
The geopolitical vector of the Eurasian concept is becoming the most relevant at the present stage in the context of increased interest in the geopolitical discourse and research of interaction, the “clash of civilizations”.
For the modern Russian political discourse, the Eurasian theme has become one of the most promising foreign policy vectors. At present, we can observe how the theoretical concept of classic Eurasianism is reflected in Russia’s foreign policy. The Eurasian project began to be implemented from theory into political practice.
About the Author
D. E. LyubinaRussian Federation
Daria E. Lyubina, Postgraduate Student
References
1. Abaev N. V., Fel’dman V. R. Evraziiskii proekt i budushchee Rossii // Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 1. S. 155–158.
2. Bazavluk S. V. Evraziistvo: terminologicheskaya ambivalentnost’ // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. T. 18. № 2. S. 273–283. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-2-273-283.
3. Bazavluk S. V. Kritika evraziistva i neoevraziistva // Postsovetskie issledovaniya. 2018. T. 1, 8. S. 726–735.
4. Vinokurov E. Yu. Pragmaticheskoe evraziistvo // Evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya. 2013. № 4 (21). S. 7–20.
5. Dugin A. Evraziiskii put’. M. : Arktogeya-Centr, 2002.
6. Dugin A. Misterii Evrazii. M. : Arktogeya, 1996.
7. Dugin A. Osnovy geopolitiki. 4-e izd. (dopolnennoe). M. : Arktogeya-Centr, 2002. 38 s.
8. Kefeli I. F. Bol’shaya Evraziya: tsivilizatsionnoe prostranstvo i proektirovanie budushchego // Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika. 2018. № 3. S. 60–68.
9. Kineva T. S. Evraziistvo v sovremennom ideino-politicheskom prostranstve Rossii // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik. 2009. № 18. S. 1–6.
10. Makkinder Kh. Dzh. Geograficheskaya os’ istorii // Polis. 1995. № 4. S. 162–169.
11. Makkinder Kh. D. Demokraticheskie idealy i real’nost’ // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 2. S. 134–144.
12. Maslin M. A., Lupova A. A. Evolyutsiya evraziiskoi idei // Russkoe zarubezh’e. 2014. № 3. S. 17–75.
13. Nikulina A. A., Toropygin A. V. K voprosu o kontseptual’noi osnove razvitiya Evraziiskoi integratsii // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2017. № 3. S. 60–67. DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2017-3-60-67.
14. Novozhenina I. V. Evraziistvo: retrospektiva ili perspektiva razvitiya // Sovremennaya nauka. 2015. № 2. S. 19–22.
15. Orlik I. I. Evraziiskaya ideya: vozniknovenie i evolyutsiya // Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Vseobshchaya istoriya. 2010. № 4. S. 7–21.
16. Ochirova T. Geopoliticheskaya kontseptsiya evraziistva // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 1994. № 1. S. 47–55.
17. Panarin A. S. Rossiya v tsivilizatsionnom protsesse (mezhdu atlantizmom i evraziistvom). M., 1994. 262 s.
18. Rudskaya N. V. K voprosu ob aktual’nosti russkogo evraziiskogo proekta v novykh geopoliticheskikh real’nostyakh // Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2014. № 2 (196). S. 52–58.
19. Savitskii P. N. Geograficheskie i geopoliticheskie osnovy evraziistva // Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek: Sb. M. : AST, 2003.
20. Savitskii P. N. Evraziiskaya kontseptsiya russkoi istorii. Russkie sredi narodov Evrazii. Osnovy geopolitiki Rossii // Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek: Sb. M. : AST, 2003.
21. Savitskii P. N. Evraziistvo // Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek: Sb. M. : AST, 2003.
22. Savitskii P. N. Kontinent Evraziya. M. : Agraf, 1997.
23. Sokolov S. M. Geopoliticheskii aspekt evraziiskoi kontseptsii // Evraziistvo i mir. 2014. № 3. S. 25–33.
24. Trubetskoi N. Russkaya problema // Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek: Sb. M. : AST, 2003.
25. Trubetskoi N. S. Vzglyad na russkuyu istoriyu ne s Zapada, a s Vostoka // Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek: Sb. M. : AST, 2003.
26. Bassin M. Russia between Europe and Asia: The Ideological Construction of Geographical Space // Slavic Review. 1991. T. 50, 1.
27. Laruelle Marlène. Le néo-eurasisme russe. L’empire après l’empire? Cahiers du Monde Russe 42 (1). 2001. Pp. 71–94.
28. Smith G. The Mask of Proteus: Russia Geopolitical Shift // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1999. No. 24 (4). Pp. 481–494.
29. Tsyngankov A. Hard-Line Eurasianism and Russia’s Contending Geopolitical Perspectives // East European Quarterly. 1998. No. 32 (3). Pp. 320–334.
Review
For citations:
Lyubina D.E. Foundations of Modern Eurasianism in Russian Political Discourse. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: economics, law, politics. 2020;14(4):120-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2020-4-120-128