The Union State in the Perception of Business: Are There Any Effects on Economic Integration?

The Union State of Russia and Belarus is the longest-lasting regional integration project in the postSoviet space. The biggest volume of contradictions is accumulated in the area of economic integration, including the interaction between Russian and Belarusian enterprises. However, it is the corporate integration (“integration from below”) that creates prerequisites for achieving economic integration goals and objectives of the Union State. The aim of the research is to analyze the perception of the Union State by Russian regional enterprises as a project of economic integration of Russia and Belarus. The method of research is a semi-structured focused interview with representatives (owners, managers) of Sverdlovsk Region enterprises operating in Belarus. The article is structured as follows: the first part analyzes the economic integration of Russia and Belarus in the framework of the Union State. The second part is devoted to the description of the research design and characteristics of the sample. The third part answers the question whether the perception of Russian regional business has any effects on economic integration from the Union State. The analysis of regional enterprises’ perception of such integration project as the Union State shows that for the majority of respondents it is a political project that does not give significant economic benefits to Russian enterprises. Research results: a) most enterprises do not seek deeper economic integration of Russia and Belarus; b) Russian enterprises do not view the Union State as a single and economically beneficial space for doing business; c) Russian enterprises see the need to remove national barriers to facilitate interaction between Russian and Belarusian enterprises.

1. Abramov R. A., Strelchenko S. G., Derevyanko S. V. Interregional cooperation in the integration processes of the Union State // Spatial Economics. No. 4. 2016. P. 153–173. (In rus)

2. Bukonkin D. A. Problems of delayed integration: what prevents Belarus and Russia from strengthening the Union State [Electronic resource] // Evraziya. Ekspert. 03.03.2021. URL: https://eurasia.expert/chto-meshaet-belarusi-irossii-usilit-soyuznoe-gosudarstvo/ (date of access: 23.03.2021). (In rus)

3. Libman A. M. "Integration from below" in Central Asia [Electronic resource] // Eurasian economic integration. 2009. No. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integratsiya-snizu-v-tsentralnoy-azii (date of access: 23.05.2021). (In rus)

4. Selivanova I. F. Russian-Belarusian Relations: Union State or Union of States? // Mir peremen. 2006. No. 2. P. 184– 187. (In rus)

5. Suzdal'tsev A. I. Crisis of the Union State of Belarus and Russia // World Economy and International Relations. 2020. Vol. 64. No. 3. P. 56–67. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-3-56-67. (In rus)

6. Suzdal'tsev A. I. The Republic of Belarus: the evolution of the policy of balancing between the Union State of Belarus and Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union // Actual problems of Europe. 2021. No. 1 (109). P. 193–232. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.01.09. (In rus)

7. Ushkalova D. I. To the question of the applicability of the existing theories of economic integration to the interaction of Russia with the countries of the "neighborhood belt" // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2013. No. 5. P. 150–160. (In rus)

8. Filkevich I. A. New priorities of macroeconomic cooperation of the EAEU member states // International cooperation of Eurasian states: politics, economics, law. 2020. No. 2. P. 104–112. (In rus)

9. Kheifets B. A., Libman A. M. Corporate integration. Alternative for the post-Soviet space. M. : LKI, 2008. P. 162. (In rus)

10. Shurubovich A. V. Union State and Actual Problems of Russian-Belarusian Integration // Problems of the Post-Soviet Space. 2019. No. 6. P. 244–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2019-6-3-244-258. (In rus)

11. Epshtein V. A., Vil'chinskii A. S. Problematic nodes of integration interaction between Russia and Belarus // World of Russian-speaking countries. 2020. No. 1 (3). P. 22–34. DOI: 10.20323/2658-7866-2020-1-3-22-34. (In rus)

12. Irnazarov F., Salmanov Z. Regional Integration in Central Asia: Measuring the Perceptions of Economic Actors in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), Regional Competence — Building for Think-Tanks in the South Caucasus and Central Asia, 2012.

13. Kłysiński K., Chawryło K., Wiśniewska I. The Failure of the Russian-Belarusian Summit [Electronic resource] // Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich. 09.12.2019. URL: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2019-12-09/failurerussian-belarusian-summit (date of access: 23.03.2021).

14. Maloletko A. N., Kaurova O. V., Ermilov A. N. et al. Approaches to the Study of Factors Stimulating the Development of Cooperation Between Large and Small Businesses in Russia and the Republic of Belarus // Springer, Cham. 2021. Vol. 316. P. 325–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57831-2_34.

15. Newnham R. Russia and Belarus: Economic Linkage in a Patron-Client Relationship // Journal of Belarusian Studies. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/20526512-12340002.

16. Polglase-Korostelev G. The Union State: A Changing Relationship between Belarus and Russia // Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. No. 2. P. 38–46.

17. Pugačiauskas V. The Russian-Belarusian Integration: Political Puzzles of “31 Roadmaps” // Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review. 2020. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 177–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47459/lasr.2020.18.8.

18. Vieira A. A. Tale of Two Unions: Russia-Belarus Integration Experience and Its Lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union // Journal of Borderlands Studies. 2017. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 41–53. DOI: https://doi-org.gate3.library.lse.ac. uk/10.1080/08865655.2016.1211959.

19. Žulys A. Towards a Union State of Russia and Belarus [Electronic resource] // Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review. 2005. No. 15–16. P. 148–169. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=22322 (date of access: 26.04.2021).